The Citizen, 2009-09-17, Page 5THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2009. PAGE 5.
Bonnie
Gropp
TThhee sshhoorrtt ooff iitt
T he guy looked harmless enough. A
geezer, obviously, somewhat shabbily
dressed, but skinny as a hockey stick
and hardly menacing.
Still, what was he doing, prowling around
this low-income New Jersey neighbourhood,
peering at houses? The cops in the cruiser
decided not to take any chances. They gave
him a couple of squawks on the car siren,
came out both doors and confronted the perp.
“Police officers,” said the lead constable.
“What is your name, sir?”
“Bob Dylan,” the stranger replied.
The standard response from most cops here
would be ‘Oh, a wise guy.’ – but this was an
exceedingly young cop. Her second question
was, “Okay, sir, what are you doing here?”
“Uh, I’m on tour,” the geezer said.
Yup, it was the real Bob Dylan interacting
with a cop young enough to be his great
granddaughter. (“I don’t think she was familiar
with the entire body of his work,” a superior
officer reflected wryly).
Not surprising. The cop was 24 years old.
Dylan’s pushing 70.
The New Jersey intervention was merely the
latest geezer/rocker report but you can expect
to hear more. There are an awful lot of long-
toothed musical legends roaming around out
there.
Consider: Dylan’s 68; Mick Jagger’s 66.
Joe Cocker? Sixty-four.
Then of course there’s Crosby (67), Stills
(64) and Nash (67).
Not to mention Canada’s ageless
Troubadour of Love, Leonard Cohen – 74 and
holding.
Not only holding, but touring. With a
vengeance. Every last rheumatic, arthritic,
sclerotic, wrinkled and wizened one of them.
They’re out there on the road somewhere
tonight, up on stages in concert halls and
coffee houses singing and strumming as if they
were teenagers.
Which most of them haven’t been for about
a half a century.
I remember when Pierre Berton wrote a
regular column in The Toronto Daily Star back
in the ’70s. Each December he would publish
his New Year’s forecast in which he would
confidently predict, year after year, that next
year – finally – that musical abomination
known as Rock and Roll would achieve its
richly deserved demise and disappear forever.
Pierre Berton died; Rock rolls on.
And on.
Perhaps that’s because Rock and Roll’s
already a lot older than we realized.
Doctor Rupert Till, a university professor in
York, England has been poking around the
ruins of Stonehenge for the past few years. He
now posits the theory that the prehistoric
monument on the Salisbury plain was not the
religious shrine, burial ground or astronomical
observatory some think it was.
Stonehenge, says the prof, may well have
been the world’s first ‘rave’ arena.
Professor Rupert conducted some
complicated experiments using acoustical
measuring instruments on a life-size replica of
Stonehenge constructed in Washington with
all the stones intact.
“We managed to get the whole space to
resonate,” he says, “almost like a wineglass if
you run your finger round it. While that was
happening a simple drumbeat sounded
incredibly dramatic.”
Stonehenge a Neolithic Woodstock?
Who knows? Maybe some of the skeletal
remains found there belonged to scalpers and
groupies.
All I know is, Rock and Roll shows no signs
of lying down and dying yet.
And neither does Bob Dylan, for that matter.
The news recently leaked out that the Bard of
Hibbing is planning to release – please God,
make this some computer geek’s warped idea
of online humour – an album of Christmas
music.
Dylan croaking out Hark the Herald Angels
Sing? The man’s been everything from a
hippie to a hard-line Zionist to a Jesus Freak.
Can’t wait to hear what he brings to Frosty the
Snowman.
Elsewhere on the pop music front, it’s been
announced that yet another geriatric world
celebrity, Joe Ratzinger, has signed with
Geffen Records and is working on his
Christmas album. It’ll be his first release, but
music execs are expecting big things because
the work will play to a built-in audience base:
the Catholic Church. The album will be called
Alma Mater.
Mister Ratzinger, AKA Pope Benedict XVI,
is 82.
Arthur
Black
Other Views Hope I record before I get old
T he trials of Michael Bryant are forcing
Ontario’s ruling Liberals to take
another look at who they will choose to
succeed Premier Dalton McGuinty and
they cannot feel encouraged by what they
see.
Bryant, the former attorney general who left
McGuinty’s cabinet still with a burning
ambition to succeed the premier and
considered by most the front-runner, faces
charges of criminal negligence causing death
and dangerous operation of a vehicle after his
car had a run-in with a bicycle courier.
He may well be acquitted, but a party will be
wary of choosing a leader who has even faced
such an allegation, when other aspirants for
the job have not.
The premier’s job is not vacant and
McGuinty has said he will continue to lead in
the 2011 election, but every previous premier
insisted he was not leaving until he formally
made the announcement, to avoid being a lame
duck.
But whether McGuinty leaves before or
soon after 2011, Bryant would have been seen
as either the leading or one of the leading
candidates to succeed him.
He showed his ambition not merely through
ability and hard work that was commendable,
but his eagerness to grab headlines and latterly
express views different from McGuinty’s.
But it always seemed unlikely the Liberals
would pick Bryant, because he was
consistently too aggressive and angry, some of
which has come out in the incident that led to
his arrest.
Bryant in and around the legislature was
invariably intense, fighting or ready to fight,
unable to relax, poke mild fun at, joke with, or
even compliment opponents, as most members
of all parties sometimes do.
This is a contrast to all other recent
premiers, John Robarts, William Davis, Frank
Miller, David Peterson, Bob Rae, even the
mostly rough-and-tough Mike Harris, and
Ernie Eves, who were able to speak without, in
every word, denouncing opponents.
Ontarians generally have chosen premiers
with whom they felt comfortable and comfort
was not a quality Bryant exuded.
The potential successors to McGuinty
mostly will not strike fear in the hearts of
Progressive Conservatives and New
Democrats.
Deputy Premier George Smitherman has
skills that include a quick grasp of complexity,
but clearly is more interested in running for
mayor of Toronto. This may be because he is
openly gay and feels this would be an obstacle
in seeking votes across Ontario, although it
has not been tested.
But he also is handicapped by being
unacceptably impatient with dissenters,
demonstrated particularly when he was health
minister and nicknamed Furious George.
Finance Ministers generally are considered
potential contenders for leader and Dwight
Duncan has been mostly a tower of strength in
that post, first during an emergency and later
in a more permanent role, although he may
have to take blame for the harmonized, more
pervasive sales tax.
But he lacked personal appeal in the
leadership race McGuinty won and modestly
has acknowledged himself “the non-sexy
MPP from Windsor.”
Municipal Affairs Minister Jim Watson
consistently is named among possible leaders,
but has shown no enthusiasm for dealing with
heavyweight problems, such as those of
downtowns in small urban areas, and his skill
mainly has been offering lightweight, witty
asides.
A woman would be almost mandatory in
any race and the most formidable in cabinet is
Education Minister Kathleen Wynne, who has
the achievement of having defeated then
Conservative leader John Tory in his attempt
to win a Toronto seat that would have been
invaluable to his party, but she also is gay.
The Liberals’ best prospects may lie in a
little known minister, John Wilkinson, an MPP
only since 2003, who is bright and polished
enough that McGuinty plucked him from the
back benches first to persuade industry to get
more innovative and later to sell his
harmonized sales tax, on which the Liberals
may live or die.
Wilkinson is the only Liberal currently in
line who has the qualities of being both smart
and comforting and this is what the party
should be looking for.
Eric
Dowd
FFrroomm
QQuueeeenn’’ss PPaarrkk
The big day had arrived. The early hours
brought the promise of perfection, blue
skies, sunshine, pleasant temperatures,
warm with just the right bite of crispness in the
air to turn thoughts to autumn.
And with the dawning of the morning came
excitement, an energy and enthusiasm barely
contained, building in anticipation for what
was to come. After days and days of practising,
preparing and perfecting, the moment to take
centre stage was nigh.
Today was the annual fall fair day and with it
the school parade.
I still remember vividly leaving our
classrooms, which we had only just entered for
the start of a new school year, and heading out
en masse to work on our marching technique.
The lush, green lawn, the hundreds of bodies
clambering into formation, by grade, by
height, and with the hopes that a friend would
be nearby.
Not that the last point mattered because
talking was strictly prohibited. This was
serious stuff. Chattering could bring anything
in those days from a stern reprimand, to
humiliation to worst-case scenario (remember,
life was different then) a cuff on the back of the
head.
Also, we really did march, not walk. And as
that obviously wasn’t typical, keeping time
was drilled over and over again.
Well-rehearsed, we met at the school on fair
day and in regimental style made our way to
the fairgrounds, Locals lined main street to
watch as we strutted through town, past the
snickering high school students (a degrading
state of affairs for Grade 8s) before finally
taking our orderly place for the opening
ceremonies.
Decades later, I had arrived in Brussels and
was among those lining the streets to watch,
with all the other proud parents, my little guy
march in his first fall fair parade.
It’s a tradition that has existed for
generations, recognizing the importance of
student participation in this annual agricultural
event. And this year, as I think of the potential
closures of schools in Blyth and East
Wawanosh, and the almost assured next on the
chopping block, Brussels, I have to wonder
what it will mean for this customary fall
celebration.
The Avon Maitland District School Board in
its accommodation review has proposed
construction of a kindergarten to Grade 6
school for students from the first two schools,
plus Turnberry and Wingham. Senior grades
would be sent to F.E. Madill. It has been
indicated that Brussels students would
eventually be added to this, however, that
school is also now being reviewed with a group
that includes Grey, Listowel and Wallace.
One can only assume it will be the end of the
student parade for sure. Certainly, parents can
keep kids home on fair days, but it’s unlikely
the school administration will see fit to have all
students involved in something that means
little to many of them, nor will they spend time
with a portion of the population to prepare
them for an event in their community while
others sit in class.
With this connection lost it’s inevitable that
the entries in the schoolwork categories will
probably decline and along with it, the interest
in the fair, beyond the midway for a new
generation.
It’s been said over and over lately, and will
be said over and over again, that the board
doesn’t care what the loss of a school does to a
community. And losing the involvement with
the fair is yet one more disconnect from our
rural roots.
Leadership race sees changes
Our rural roots
Letters Policy
The Citizen welcomes letters to the
editor.
Letters must be signed and should
include a daytime telephone number for
the purpose of verification only. Letters
that are not signed will not be printed.
Submissions may be edited for length,
clarity and content, using fair comment
as our guideline. The Citizen reserves
the right to refuse any letter on the basis
of unfair bias, prejudice or inaccurate
information. As well, letters can only be
printed as space allows. Please keep
your letters brief and concise.