Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 2011-06-16, Page 5THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, JUNE 9, 2011. PAGE 5. Human kind Cannot bear very much reality. – T.S. Eliot Idon’t get reality TV. Oh, I understand why it’s popular with television producers and entertainment conglomerates – they get entire TV series delivered to their door without having to pay for writers or expensive studios and sets; they get to use non-union ‘actors’ willing to perform for free or next to it. But why does anyone want to watch the result? To see what happens when a gaggle of strangers gets marooned on a desert island? Puh-leeze. That’s no desert island and nobody’s marooned. This is a celluloid entertainment, remember? At the bare minimum there’s a camera operator, a lighting technician and a sound man riding the levels on hidden microphones. I’m also willing to bet there’s a director, an assistant director and a gaggle of college dropout ‘special assistants’ clutching clipboards just off camera. Not to mention a helicopter and crew on standby in case somebody wants fresh croissants with their coffee. It’s a shuck, folks – and the French, bless their mercenary hearts, appear to have figured that out. Last year the highest court in France ruled that contestants in the French version of Temptation Island were entitled to contracts and employee benefits, including a 35-hour workweek, overtime… And oh yes, a base pay rate equivalent to $1,900 per actor per day. French production company executives sobbed that they’ll have to come up with nearly $71 million in back pay. Cry me a riviere. The American Idol franchise brought in that much in just three months on air. But when it comes to reality TV, the money is just, well, unreal. Consider the maximally mammaried, minimally talented reality TV star Kim Kardashian. Estimated salary for 2010: $6 million. And then there’s Planet Calypso, a mineral- rich frontier on which investors around the world have been snapping up properties and leases for the past few years. One of those investors, Hollywood filmmaker/entrepreneur Jon Jacobs, recently cashed out his Planet Calypso properties for a cool $635,000 U.S. Not bad, for an investment of a mere $100,000. Especially not bad when you consider that Planet Calypso doesn’t exist. It’s an imaginary asteroid, part of an on-line game called Entropia Universe. Jon Jacobs pocketed more than half a million real dollars by selling fictional real estate on a make- believe celestial body. As usual, you and I are slightly behind the curve. Planet Calypso is only one of many mythical marketplaces on which online investors are actively ‘doing business’. A marketing firm called In-Stat estimates that online players spent $7 billion last year on the purchase of non-existent property and goods. Which brings us to the Toronto Public Library (TPL). Thanks to the introduction of an innovative project. TPL patrons with an active library card can partake of a project called the ‘Human Library’. Participants don’t take out a book, a tape or a CD; they take out a living, breathing, interacting human being. Some of the people waiting to be ‘signed out’ (for a half-hour at a time, conversation only) include a retired police officer, a comedian, a former sex worker, a model and a person who has survived both cancer and homelessness. The idea is to facilitate conversations between library patrons and people from other walks of life who they might not otherwise get to meet. The Human Library is an attempt to ‘travel back in time’ in effect, to an age when, as a TPL official put it, “storytelling from person to person was the only way to learn”. Sounds like a great idea, The Human Library. No doubt some Hollywood hotshot is figuring out how to turn it into a reality show. Arthur Black Other Views Come on! A small dose of ‘reality’ There’s a reason why everyone outside of the five burroughs of New York City hates the New York Yankees. There has always been a stigma surrounding the team, accusing them of buying championships. So last year when arguably the best basketball player in North America, LeBron James, said he and Chris Bosh (the best player the Toronto Raptors had seen in some time) were both heading to Miami to play with another one of the NBA’s top five players Duane Wade, it looked like the Yankees business model had been adapted for the hard court. After all, who couldn’t win an NBA Championship with three of the league’s best 10 players on one team? Not only had they chosen this shortcut, but James had also scorned his former team, the Cleveland Cavaliers, in an hour-long television special where he announced he would be leaving his hometown team (he was born and bred in Akron, Ohio). However, on Sunday night, it was the Dallas Mavericks that hoisted the coveted Larry O’Brien Trophy. This was a team that had been together for so long that critics everywhere were thinking it was about time to “blow up” the team and start from scratch, as many of the team’s better players were starting to get on in age (in basketball terms). Often there is no substitute for hard work put in as a team. This was the stance taken by Cavaliers owner Dan Gilbert who still feels the sting of James’s departure, stating after the Dallas victory “There are no shortcuts. None.” That’s why fans of baseball (and really all sports) hate the Yankees. Every year after the World Series is won by someone other than the Yankees, the question always becomes “What move will the Yankees make to put themselves into contention?” This move, of course, won’t be in the New York farm system, it will be, as they call it in hockey, cherry picking. It has gotten to the point that some of the clubs with lower incomes, such as the Florida Marlins, the Oakland A’s, the Cleveland Indians and others serve as a farm system for the Yankees. These teams have great scouts, they draft good players, develop the talent, only to relinquish said players to the Yankees when they can no longer afford to pay them. And when a great player hits the market, it’s assumed that the Yankees will pick him up. When Cliff Lee became a free agent at the end of the 2010 season, the Yankees (essentially) drove a dump truck of money to Lee’s house. Sure, he decided to go to Philadelphia, but the Lee situation last year was yet another example of the Yankees having the best chance at a World Series, simply because they have the most money to spend. This came, of course, after a defeat in the American League Championship Series at the hands of the Texas Rangers in a series that set the record for the biggest payroll disparity in sports history. The Yankees cost owners $207 million that year, while the Rangers only cost their owners $55 million. But it was the Rangers who went on to the World Series, only to lose to the San Francisco Giants (who had a slightly higher payroll at $118 million). When O.J. Simpson jettisoned his possessions before going to jail, anyone could buy his 1968 Heisman Trophy if they had enough money. Laying down that kind of cash, however, doesn’t mean that you rushed for over 1,700 yards and scored 22 touchdowns that year for the University of Southern California. You didn’t earn those things, it just means you have the deepest pockets. Can’t buy me love I’m beginning to feel like a one-trick pony when talking about school closures and my experiences with them, but I believe the most recent announcement by the Avon Maitland District School Board (AMDSB), to potentially rename existing schools that are going to stay open, is a flawed decision. The board opened a questionnaire on its website last month to allow students, parents and community members to name the new school in Wingham, but also gave the opportunity to rename the schools that will remain open after the slated closures next year, including Grey Central Public School and Hullett Central Public School. I understand the need for the proposed Wingham public school to have a name that represents all the communities it will draw from, but, if my experience with the school board has taught me anything in this particular forum, we’ll probably be dealing with an uninspired, unoriginal name. I’m very jaded when it comes to the idea of renaming schools because the first public school I attended was recently renamed as a result of amalgamation and I was downright furious when it happened. I attended Robertson Memorial Public School in Goderich. Let’s break that down – Robertson (the last name of three brothers in Goderich who were well-thought of in the community and successful in their fields when the school was opened in 1963) Memorial (meaning it has been named in memory of someone who has passed away) Public School (well.. that’s pretty self-explanatory). The school was renamed Goderich Public School. Now the blandness, the absolute vanilla-ness of the decision to name it that really grated my nerves, but what got me green with Hulk-like rage was that they had changed something that had been named in honour of someone and renamed it to something that didn’t represent anything about the community besides the name. Even something like Goderich District Collegiate Institute is better than simply appending the location to what it is. The DCI part of GDCI has flair and character. Wingham already has F.E. Madill Secondary School which is, as far as I know, not a name based on location but as an honorary act. So, suffice to say, I was unhappy about the renaming not because of the act but because of the result. I can see a similar reaction from people who have children attending, or who themselves attended, Hullett Central or Grey Central Public Schools. Yes these schools are named for the area they are in, but there is history behind those names. For each letter of their names there are hundreds of graduates with memories of the school they went to. To change the name of a school when it was decided that it should stay open seems to be a waste of money (letterhead, signs, sports jerseys, student cards, etc.) and time in my opinion, especially given the track record I know of. No announcement has been made regarding the names of the three schools, but I can only hold my breath and hope that Grey and Hullett remain the same. Changing the name to reflect the schools that students previously came from would be nice, but, in the end, it won’t change the fact that schools have been closed. It won’t stop the schools from closing and, in the end, won’t allow past graduates to point at a school and say “I graduated there.” To this day, despite the initial confusion it sometimes causes, if asked I say I went to Robertson Memorial Public School. To those new to the area it requires some description, but I didn’t go to Goderich Public School in the same way graduates of Hullett or Grey didn’t go to, for instance, Londesborough or Ethel public schools. The closure of Blyth, Brussels, East Wawanosh and all the other schools is a mistake in my mind because it leaves the school board unprepared for when the population does begin to grow again. The process seems to be planning for the worst (a declining enrollment) but leaving very few options if the population begins to rise. If we ever get to the point when Blyth and Brussels need their own schools again, the long-term ramifications of closing the schools are going to be felt and the cost of building a brand new school is going to be high. That said, forcing the schools that stayed open to be renamed isn’t going to draw attention away from the fact that Blyth P.S. students will no longer be Blyth P.S. students. Brussels students are going to become Grey students, or Wingham students, or something similar. East Wawanosh students will probably still refer to themselves as such until they graduate. Renaming the school isn’t going to change the way people feel about the closure, it’s only going to cause the people who got to keep their school to feel as if they’re losing it anyways. The idea is flawed, the process is unnecessary and the result is going to be, in my opinion, far from what anyone wants. Schools are already closing, taking the unique local identity they provide away from students, let’s leave it at that, don’t take the identity away from the students and families and communities who ended up keeping their schools. Shawn Loughlin Shawn’s Sense Denny Scott Denny’s Den Renaming of schools unnecessary