HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 2011-04-14, Page 5THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, APRIL 14, 2011. PAGE 5.
Nostalgia ain’t what it used to be.
– Anonymous
Indeed it ain’t. I’ve just learned that the
Nickelodeon cable network is preparing to
launch a new television series whimsically
entitled “The 90s Were All That”.
Yes, it’s a TV show about a decade. No,
they’re not talking about the 1890s.
I can’t even remember the 1990s – and I
don’t drug or drink.
It’s not that I’m nostalgia challenged. I feel
a distinct sense of mourning for family farms,
elm trees, 10-cent coffee and drive-in movies.
I miss milkmen, gas station attendants,
paper boys and telephone receptionists.
I long for the heft of a real typewriter, metal
hotel room keys, vinyl records – and I’d swap
my flimsy plastic cell phone lozenge for a
good old clunky rotary job in a heartbeat.
But that’s not the world we live in anymore.
Today, trends pop up on the far horizon and
then disappear with a swoosh in the rear view
mirror before we have a chance to hiccup.
It took Tolstoy six years to write War and
Peace . The media phenomenon known as
“&#*! My Dad Says” went from original
twitter feed to YouTube sensation to bestseller
list to hit TV series in just six weeks.
I grant you, in terms of quality there is some
distance between the two works, but still…
Last year, in a moment of lemming-like
consumer delusion I briefly considered lashing
out $800 for a brand new state-off-the-art iPad.
Good thing I resisted. The launch of iPad II
earlier this year has rendered the original
hopelessly obsolete.
It’s not just iPads – have you got an iPod?
Put it on eBay, pal. The iPhone was a dagger
in the back of the iPod, the sales of which have
been sagging steadily for the past three years.
While you’re at it, dump your discs. I’m not
talking about LPs and 45’s – they’ve been
extinct for eons. I mean your floppy discs,
your mini-discs, yea, even your CDs and
DVDs. Netflix and iTunes are pushing them
off the cliff even as I type these words on my
laughably out-of-date laptop (two years old
and ready for the scrap yard).
Those CDs still make nifty drink coasters,
though. And if you string a few of them
together and hang them in the garden they
might keep the starlings away.
Some old technologies refuse to lie down
and die. It is still possible to walk into a
Western Union office and dictate a telegram –
even though telegrams haven’t made much
sense since that day in August, 1876 when
Alexander Graham Bell placed the world’s
first long distance call from Brantford, Ontario
to the town of Paris, 10 miles away.
Fax machines, those mastodons of office
communication, lurk on desktops everywhere
– right beside the computers and scanners that
were supposed to replace them.
Film cameras are supposed to be dead and
buried – the world’s last roll of Kodachrome
colour film was processed at Dwayne’s Photo
Service in Parson’s, Kansas last July -- but
diehard purists insist that digital photos lack
the ‘soul’ of old fashioned film. Wishful
thinking or not, you can still buy film for your
Kodak Brownie.
Back about the time North Americans were
first getting used to the idea of telephones and
electric lights there lived a nephew of the
Sioux warrior Crazy Horse named Red Fox.
He was a chief himself, a learned man and an
early advocate for aboriginal rights. In his
autobiography he wrote: “I met Thomas
Edison and Alexander Graham Bell and many
others who impressed me as great people, but
pride in them and their achievements has not
over-awed me, for I am not convinced that the
comforts and advancements which they have
brought to the world have made people more
content and happy than the Indians were
through the centuries on the mountains,
prairies and deserts of the primeval, virgin
continent”.
A few years ago a tourist in Washington was
riding in a taxi past the federal archives
building and noticed the legend carved in
granite across the front of the building. It read:
“WHAT’S PAST IS PROLOGUE”.
“What does that mean?” the tourist asked.
“It means,” said the driver, “that you ain’t
seen nothin’ yet.”
I fear that both Chief Red Fox and the cabbie
were right.
Arthur
Black
Other Views Caution: future dead ahead
The largely symbolic concept of a
remuneration freeze was raised at Huron
County Council’s April 6 meeting just
before the 2011 budget was officially adopted.
Contrary to a motion made by Huron East
Mayor Bernie MacLellan in December of
2010, Bluewater’s Paul Klopp suggested that
Huron County Council remunerations be
frozen this year. Not because it would equate
big savings for taxpayers, he admitted, but
more for the message it would send and the
example it would set.
Remuneration has always been a hot topic.
When politicians sign cheques to pay
themselves with money that isn’t theirs, it’s
almost human nature to be suspicious.
However, as these costs are all a matter of
public record, so as 2011 budgets roll in we
should now know that in exchange for
governing our communities, dedicating time
they don’t have and making decisions we
wouldn’t want to make, our councillors,
mayors, reeves and deputies make a wage that
most students would turn their noses up at.
Seriously, there are kids out there flipping
burgers and serving beer on golf courses who
make more through part-time jobs than the
majority of our elected representatives do. And
while it’s not ideal, these councillors sign up
for the job, as well as the wage.
Honorariums for mayors and reeves in The
Citizen’s five municipalities range from $7,500
to $11,000 in 2011. Throw them a few
thousands dollars more for being a Huron
County Councillor (and meeting compensation
and mileage) and you have your bottom line.
Like I said, they sign up for it, but when
councillors like Klopp feel they need to keep
these bargain basement rates low despite staff
pay increases and the annual cost of living
increase, you have to wonder if our
expectations are a little unreasonable.
When Huron East Council considered a wind
turbine development policy at its April 5
meeting, I know I was happy to be sitting on
the side of the table I was. I wouldn’t have
wanted to make a decision between protecting
residents who could be affected by wind
turbines and putting all Huron East taxpayers
on the hook for potential legal costs, should the
bylaw be challenged.
This is where we would probably use the old
cliché, “well, that’s why we pay them the big
bucks,” except that we don’t.
Sure most municipal representatives are
successful in owning their own business, or in
holding down a well-paying career, but to
make those decisions and to carve our path into
the future, we pay them a pittance.
So while there will always be those who
complain that our local representatives are paid
too much, I certainly won’t be one of them.
It’s easy to read our larger newspapers and
see six-figure salaries being paid and citizens
unknowingly footing the bill for things they
shouldn’t be paying for and lump all
politicians into that basket of bad apples, but
that simply isn’t the case and it’s not fair.
So next time you leave the drive-thru and
your coffee order has been botched or your
favourite “Sandwich Artist” makes you a lunch
that falls apart in your hands, remember that
more often than not those employees make
more than your mayor does.
And then ask yourself if you would want
your drive-thru barista or the “Sandwich
Artist” making decisions that could affect your
health, well-being and financial vitality.
At that point, we may find ourselves having
a little more respect for a councillor’s job and
what we pay them to do it.
Politics with that?
I don’t carry a knife. I don’t typically carry
a gun. I’m not trained in any advance form
of martial arts (unless the hours I spent
playing video games like Mortal Kombat and
Street Fighter as a kid somehow translated into
muscle memory).
When I walk out my door in the morning,
the most dangerous thing I have is a pencil
tucked behind my ear or the keys in my hand
(or my metal laptop case, I suppose I could
swing that pretty hard).
And somehow, with that limited, improvised
arsenal, I survive the day.
So, I do get a little bit miffed when people
make such a big deal over the legalization (or
illegalization) of weapons.
Police need guns.
Farmers need guns.
Hunters may need guns.
Military personnel need guns.
Police need batons.
Security guards may need batons, or tasers,
or guns, as long as they know what they’re
doing.
John Q. Public, however, doesn’t need a
gun, nor does he need a taser, or a switchblade.
So, I have to wonder, why is arming those
with prosthetic limbs such a huge concern in
Maine?
For those of you unaware of what I’m
referring to, Maine lawmakers recently
decided that, in cases of emergency, a one-
armed individual would be more useful with a
knife he didn’t have to open with his teeth.
To that end, they decided that one-armed
individuals can carry switchblades, weapons
that flip open (and can take off appendages
while doing so) that are illegal to carry in
almost all states and illegal to own in most
states.
All I can say is Doctor Richard Kimble
would be spinning in his fictional grave with
this kind of decision.
As far as I know, blades can be carried by
Americans provided they are visible, not
automatic (switchblade), gravity-swung or
centrifugally activated (butterfly-style), and
meet certain length requirements.
Why can’t these one-armed individuals wear
utility knives on their belt in a sheath like any
huntsman does?
As long as it’s on the armed side (no pun
intended) a sheath with a blade held in by a
leather strap should be more then adequate for
any “emergencies” that pop up.
Well, this kind of gets away from the point.
What is with the obsession of everyone
having to be armed? (Again, not meant to be a
pun, I need to find a different verb here).
I realize that Americans have the right to
bear ar... er, equip themselves with weapons,
but do we really need to make sure that every
sector of the community has the right to carry
something that could potentially end
someone’s life?
Some might wonder why this decision in a
New England state bothers me so much.
Well, I don’t think the Conservatives are
done leading our country yet.
That isn’t to say I do or don’t support them,
I do support numbers though.
Every poll I’ve seen thus far has the
Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) gaining
round over its competition, and CPC leader
Stephen Harper has made no attempt to hide
the fact that, as far as leaders go, he seems to
be the most American one we’ve had in a long
time (despite his claims that Liberal Party of
Canada (LPC) leader Michael Ignatieff is an
American wrapped in a Canadian flag).
So that’s what concerns me.
Conservative, Liberal, left, right, I’m not the
guy to ask about how you should vote, I’m just
frightened at the prospect of Canada being
viewed, more so, as a part of the United States.
Call it jumping the shark if you must, or
nuking the fridge, but I can’t help but wonder
if, in the future, a Canadian province will be
faced with the proposition of arming
individuals with no arms with some kind of
foot-held and mouth-operated gun.
Again, that may be a stretch, it would require
Canadians to continue to become more like our
neighbours to the south and then to adopt the
weapon-happy attitudes that they have.
I have a confession to make.
Some people have financial fears that keep
them awake at night, others fear for the lives
and livelihood of their relatives.
I fear that Canada will lose its identity.
Once upon a time we were a fighting force
to be reckoned with.
Once upon a time we were the peacekeepers
of the world.
Once upon a time we were respected.
Now we aren’t even respected enough to get
a seat on the United Nations Security Council,
a body that we have held a seat on since two
years after its original inception in 1948.
That’s the first time in more than 60 years
that we have failed to secure a seat on that
prestigious board. That tells me that something
is wrong.
Back to what inspired this fearful column
however – weapons.
Are they necessary? Yes. I’m not sitting here
saying we need a utopia where weapons don’t
exist.
Human nature leads to conflict (in my
belief), and you need the tools to end those
conflicts as quickly as possible.
However, when it gets to the point that we’re
saying one group can access weapons that are
illegal to another, when other, viable options
are available (again, in my opinion), I think
we’ve gone overboard.
While I won’t say anything as cliché as
make love not war, I will say make sense, not
senselessness.
Remember, most of us North Americans
walk to our cars, or to work every day without
a weapon, maybe our lawmakers should focus
on something a bit more important.
Oh, and say Maine’s new licence plate motto
with me folks;
“It wasn’t me, it was the one-armed man!”
Shawn
Loughlin
Shawn’s Sense
Maine setting itself up for Fugitive 2
Denny
Scott
Denny’s Den