Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 2011-01-06, Page 5THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, JANUARY 6, 2011. PAGE 5. It is important for us, my brothers, that we exterminate from our lands this nation which seeks only to destroy us. You see as well as I that we can no longer supply our needs.... Therefore, my brothers, we must all swear their destruction and wait no longer. Nothing prevents us; they are few in numbers, and we can accomplish it. Obwandiyag, chief of the Ottawas, was no friend of the British – that was the nation that he was advocating for extermination. He did it best to make it happen too. Obwandyag and his warriors laid siege to the British fort at Detroit and massacred a British detachment at The Battle of Bloody Run nearby. Was Obwandiyag American or Canadian? Older than both. He lived and fought back in the mid-1700s along what would one day become the Ontario-Michigan border. He was decades in advance of the American Declaration of Independence and a century before the notion of a nation called Canada began to float about. Oh, and one other thing: Obwandyag had another name. Pontiac. I didn’t learn any of the above in class. In my school years, teachers of Canadian history treated the entire aboriginal presence as colourful but slightly inconvenient background to the story of the founding of Canada. We learned little of native customs, traditions and way of life, nor of the fact that when we whiteys arrived, they’d already lived on this continent for milliennia. For me as a kid, Pontiac wasn’t a fierce warrior. It was blue and black 1952 two-door sedan. It was my dad’s first car and I learned to drive in it. There was a headlight dimmer switch on the floor beside the clutch (look it up, youngsters); a stick shift on the steering column and no power anything, although it did have air conditioning – provided you cranked the windows down. It was a boringly conventional, resolutely bourgeois buggy. The only hint of the aboriginal origin of its name was the hood ornament – a stylized, Art Deco style Indian head which may or may not have looked like Pontiac the man – no authenticated drawings or paintings of him survive. Even the Indian head icon would disappear as Pontiacs underwent a radical transformation in the 60s and 70s. It stopped being The Car Your Father Drove and mutated into a roaring, low-slung, over-powered “muscle car” favoured by high-testosterone, low- browed young males. Guys with mullets and vocabularies that peaked at around 20 words, most of them blue. Guys who thought gold chains, fu manchu moustaches and tattooed knuckles were killer fashion statements. Pontiac was the brand that invented the muscle car and nobody made them louder, faster or in-your-face down and dirty. And they sold like cold beer in a heat wave. “Sportier than a Chevrolet but less uppity than an Oldsmobile or Buick” is what the Pontiac car advertisements promised and for years the company surfed a rich wave of customer loyalty. But car manufacturers are born tinkerers. They love to fix things, even if they aren’t broken (remember Edsel?) Somewhere in the mid-80s the big thinkers who gave the world GTOs. Firebirds and Trans Ams got restless and decided it was time for Pontiac to undergo a ‘brand re-think’. They summoned their designers and engineers and instructed them to come up with The Next Big Thing. They came up with a lot of things, among them a minivan called the Montana which looked like a breadtruck, and later, a ‘cross- over’ compact called the Aztek. Do you remember the Aztek? Probably not. It was around just long enough to win the coveted Daily Telegraph title of Ugliest Car of All Time. Perhaps the car was doomed from the start – its creators couldn’t even spell ‘Aztec’ correctly. The Aztek was the beginning of a death spiral for Pontiac. That spiral ended in a flush last October when General Motors announced that after 84 years and 40 million cars, the brand was officially dead. The world would see no more automobiles with the word Pontiac on the grille. Chief Obwandiyag can finally have his other name back. Arthur Black Other Views Car names require research One of the staples of the year’s first issue of The Citizen is the Year in Review. And 2010 certainly has been a year worth reviewing. It wasn’t easy, of course. As journalists, we tend to focus on the ‘here and now’ so Denny and I often have to stop and think about what happened over the course of the last seven days in our weekly staff meetings. So looking back on an entire year can be tough. When asked to review some of last year’s columns for submission in the Ontario Community Newspaper Association’s Columnist of the Year category, I had to go back and read them all. There were some I didn’t remember writing and others I could never forget, but they have all come out of what has been as eventful a year as I’ve seen in my life. I joke often about nobody reading this column, but the reality is that there are plenty of people who read what I have to say week after week, so I have always taken filling this space every week very seriously. Sometimes I’ve written about what I want to write, sometimes I’ve written what I think people might want to read and other times there have been entire columns that end up in the recycling bin for one reason or another. I’ve covered the good, the bad and the ugly in this community and throughout the country, starting in February with my thoughts on moving out of my childhood home. And since that week, I have never had a problem filling this space. The first competition submission I chose was from March when I wrote “A Hero’s Farewell”. I re-read the column and was nearly brought to tears. Not because of the beauty of my prose of course, but because of the emotions that were stirred up in facing the untimely death of OPP officer Vu Pham. Coming from a family of police officers, I still have a hard time comprehending the reasoning behind Pham’s death, but I am glad to see this great man being honoured as he has been throughout Huron County. My second submission was from July 1, a column entitled “Mending Our Fences”. After the Avon Maitland District School Board trustees made the decision to close Brussels Public School, discussion began as to whether Brussels should be the school to close, or whether it should have been Grey Central Public School. The Citizen published letters for weeks from concerned citizens, community leaders and even municipal councillors in which strong opinions were expressed and then subsequently opposed and challenged. I’m glad to say that I think the process of mending fences between the Brussels and Grey communities is well underway. My third and final submission was called “Eat Pray Puke”, an entry in which a book called Eat Pray Love makes me, you guessed it, want to puke. In between I explored fire coverage that still has members of the community concerned, an interesting trail of phone calls to the Wingham and District Hospital, Robert Munsch considering Brussels as a setting for his new book, local veterans, not-so-local veterans, dirtbags, being out of shape, snow and a mustache that raised nearly $2,000 for Prostate Cancer Canada, among countless other issues. There has been no shortage of things to talk about and I have had no shortage of things to say. I’m sure that 2011 will provide its own set of challenges and its own set of triumphs and I’ll have plenty to write about once again. A brand new year Apiece of construction scaffolding fell on Premier Dalton McGuinty’s car parked outside the legislature a few days before Christmas and he had enough wit, despite a grim legislature session to comment tongue-in-cheek on his website “the opposition will stop at nothing to keep me from my people.” The premier naturally got calls from curious reporters asking for more and he replied again somewhat inventively both New Democrat leader Andrea Horwath and Progressive Conservative leader Tim Hudak were seen fleeing the scene. This was the closest, in fact, the only attempt at humour in the last few months of a session whose daily question periods consisted mainly of the opposition parties and particularly the Conservatives daily trying to force the Liberals, who have failed often to volunteer the truth, the whole truth and nothing, to admit they were liars. The Conservatives usually started by calling the Liberals liars and Speaker Steve Peters ruled this was out of order because it could prompt a flood of other name-calling and disrupt the House. The Conservatives would then switch to suggesting the Liberals were dishonest, or flirting with the truth, or asking why the Liberals were fibbing or say people in their riding felt were lying. The Speaker also has ruled many times MPPs cannot use forbidden words merely by saying someone else was using them and some of these squabbles end with an MP, usually a Conservative, being thrown out. No one ever uses Winston Churchill’s famous claim an opponent was guilty of “terminological inexactitude,” which he appeared to have got away with in the British Parliament. Ontario politicians have not been as known for their elegance of expression, but a few over the year have shown command of language and even warmth and admiration for opponents they were assessing, which is unheard of today. William Davis, Conservative premier in the 1970s and 1980s and the longest- serving premier of recent decades, was noted for his rambling style of speaking, which seemed to flow like a torrent almost forever. One reporter wrote he enjoyed covering a Davis speech, because he could slip outside for a coffee, knowing by the time he returned, the premier would still be on the same sentence. Liberal Sean Conway, one of the few recent entertaining orators, said Davis’s circuitous speech-making was “like the route of the old Colonial Railway, which puffed and chugged, twisted and turned, clattered up hill and down dale, turned to the north, east, south and west, and meandered through the remotest villages and sidings before eventually reaching its destination.” Conway was forgiving, because Davis once said (again in his tortuous way) if someone poured all the convictions and principles of the Ontario Liberal party into he bottom of swimming pool, “we could all walk through it without getting the tops of our feet wet.” Andy Brandt, who was Conservative interim leader for four years, but never ran for full leader, was its speaker most in demand at roasts of party luminaries. He once told a gathering he was surprised to see a former Tory finance minister “standing with his hands in his own pockets, instead of someone else’s,” and pointed to another former minister as “able to speak for an hour without a note and without making a point.” John Rhodes, another Conservative, had an unforgettable description of an Ontarian, who he said, watches a French arts movie, climbs in his German-made car, drives to an Italian restaurant, orders Dutch beer and Danish cheese, drives home, takes off his shirt made in Thailand, switches on his Japanese stereo, picks up his U.S.-made ballpoint pen and writes a letter to his MPP complaining about the lack of jobs in Canada. Where has all the humour gone? Parties are scared a joke may help them lose them a crucial election and McGuinty has been the only leader willing to take this risk, but it is a minor one. Eric Dowd From Queen’s Park Shawn Loughlin Shawn’s Sense Campaign humour in short supply Queen’s Park correspondent and contributor to The Citizen Eric Dowd passed away on Dec. 25 at St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto after a battle with cancer. He submitted this column on Dec. 22. It was his last submission. For Dowd’s full obituary, see page 20. If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader. – John Quincy Adams Final Thought