Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Exeter Times-Advocate, 1952-07-10, Page 5■■r
Threatened with the renewal
of the Haigmeir suit for flood
damages, the Ausable Valley
Authority took desperate steps
at its recent meeting to imple
ment control measures along the
Parkhill Creek System of the
river.
The body approved the ap
pointment of an independent en
gineer to determine costs and
benefits of a major dam near
Parkhill. If such a project is
undertaken, it will cost hund
reds of dollars, which will be
shared by the municipalities in
the watershed and the Province
of Ontario.
To acquaint its readers with
the background of the flood con
ditions, The Times-Advocate re
prints here the research made
available in the 19 49 report, to
gether with the recommendations
made by the Department of Plan
ning and Development.
It should be explained that
Dr. L. C. Haigmeir, owner of 5,-
000 acres in McGillivray, has
threatened to proceed with a
million-dollar suit against muni
cipalities in the watershed if
there is no tangible indication
that corrective measures are be
ing taken. This suit originally
precipitated the formation of the
authority.
The serious flood problem on
the Ausable Watershed is con
fined to an area of approximat
ely 6,9 20 acres situated in the
low-lying land inshore from the
sand dune area near the origi
nal mouth of the river. Three
areas, which are usually con
sidered seperately, are the ham
let of Port Franks, the Thedford
Flats, and the Klondyke area of
which the Haig Farm forms a
large part. A fourth area which
is quite local is the town of
Parkhill. This constitutes a nui
sance flood and disrupts some in
dustries- for a short time but is
not of the magnitude of the
other three. Before dealing with
these sections separately it
would be well to review the his
tory of this part of the water
shed and particularly the natural
features of the area before it
came under cultivation.
The flats are believed to have
been represented by a bay in the
shore of a higher post-glacial
stage of Lake Huron, which was
cut off from the lake by a bar,
which forms dunes along the
present shore. This lagoon be
came partially filled with allu
vial and peat deposits leaving
what was originally Lake Bur
well, approximately ten feet
above the level of Lake Huron,
(the lake is believed to have
stretched as far south as Port
Franks. The present Lake Smith
occupied the northern end of the
old bed.)
In addition to the large area
occupied by Lake Burwell itself
the area immediately surround
ing the 'lake was marsh, thickly
covered with aquatic plants, and
beyond this was an extensive
swamp forest composed of soft
maple, elm, cedar, tamarack,
and willow. The whole area
therefore was originally wild
swamp flats merging with the
Jake which was periodically cov
ered by flood waters in spring
and summer, as .they debouched
into this low-lying basin.
Thus, this old flood area, like
so many others on the rivars of
Ontario belonged by anbient.
right to the river and by the gra
dual enroachment of farming,
necessary and useful as it is, in
volves a project of protection
which is difficult to solve, be
cause in dojng so, man is pitting
himself against the powerful forces of nature. By this, it is [
not intended to imply that such
flood problems cannot be solved,
but it should be borne in mind
that where nature in the form
F*«<> 5the T1MES-ADVOCATE, gXETER, ONTARIO, THURSDAY MORNING, JULY 10, 1952
of large rivers is brought with
in bounds, the cost usually ex
cessive, and sometimes the
money required to accomplish
such control outweighs the bene
fits to be achieved. Where this
is the case, some measure of re
lief can be achieved, but usually
a compromise must be made
amounting to half measures.
Because this part of the river
valley was known to have flood
ed in early times- to the extent
that passage up the lower reach
es was well-nigh impossible ow
ing to the accumulation of de
bris in the Lake Burwell sec
tion, it can be truthfully stated
that flooding of this area can be
considered and act of God; and
therefore, as far as the lands are
concerned the damage is com
parable to that of hail in the
western provinces and late and
early frosts in the tobacco lands.
Settlement And Drainage
When it became known that
these lands were desirable for
agricultural purposes, drainage
was undertaken on a large scale.
First in 1872-5,
Company built a cut along its
present course to ~
thereby draining
and creating
the Thedford Flats. This cut
diverted all the water from the
Ausable and allowed it to pour
down directly to the old mouth
of the river, seriously
flood
lage.
In
made
Grand
with the Cut made in
tually
River
main Ausable flowing directly
into the lake at Port Franks
the Parkhill Creek and its
bntaries flowing down the
channel to Grand Bend.
In addition to these two
jor cuts other large drains have
been excavated, not to mention
the extensive tile drains on in
dividual farms, which are essen
tial in such flat low-lying
the Canada
Port Franks,
Lake Burwell
an area known as
Flats.
hazards in the
1892 another
at the hairpin
Bend, which
increasing
above vil-
separated the
into two systems-
cut was
curve at
together
1875 vir-
Ausable
-the
and
tri-
old
ma-
land.
Flooded Areas
The Tiled ford Flats
This reclaimed marshland is
very fertile and returns are high
from specialized crops of celery,
onions, root crops and pepper
mint. Of the 2,450 acres affect
ed by the 19 4 7 flood, 77 per
cent (or 1,890 arces), is under
this intensive cultivation. The
remaining 560 acres would be
suitable for the same crops if
they were broken up.
The greatest damage
in the old Lake Burwell
summer flash floods.
is done
area by
Breakup
freshets are accepted as inevit
able and even welcomed for the
fertilizing effect of the silt de
posited, as well as the supply of
sub-soil moisture ensured. In
addition, they occur before the
ground is normally workable so
that there is little loss of the
farmer’s time. The summer
floods, although lower and less
extensive, cause heavy losses to
sown crops, making re-sowing or
substitution of a quicker grow
ing crop necessary. The 1947
June floods, though only reach
ing an elevation of 585 feet, five
feet above lake level at that
time, covered 500 acres in the
most heavily cultivated parts. It
affected a large number of grow
ers as part of this area is work
ed 10 and 20 acre plots by vil
lagers of Thedford and neigh
bouring farmers. An indication
of the amount of possible loss is
the fact that a grower may live
in Thedford and derive his cash
income from as little as five
acres, returns varying from $200
per acre for sugar beets to $2,-
000 per acre for dutch sets.
In the case of spring freshets
the water rises in the river
channel south of the Canada
Company Cut and overflows over
a length of 1,500 feet at Black’s
Bridge in Lot 26/27, Concession
1, Township of Williams West,
flowing northwest and spread
ing west into th© flats area,
joining the water backed up the
drainage ditches from the cut.
Of the remaining flow down the
river, at the highest stage, not
more than 20 per cent overflows
down the old channel to the
Klondyke Area, the balance flow
ing down the put. The Cut has
sufficient capacity to contain the
flow until the low ground of
the Lake Burwell bed is reach
ed and water backs up the drain
age ditches onto the flats. North
of the Cut, water backs up the
Teitzel Drain to
tween lots 20 and
east end of that
point the higher
Haig Farm area back up the De-
fore Drain, overflow the road
and make their way to the Cut.
The Klondyke Area
rrhe Klondyke area consists of
7,500 acres, about half of which
is under cultivation, on the old
Ausable channel and lower Park
hill Creek—locally knokn as the
Ptsebe—and includes the greater
part of the flooded area of
acres or 7.59 square
(1947).
With the exception of a
amount of water
flows down, the
channel from the
Cut, all the flood
from the Ptsebe system and two
small creeks which empty into
the old
Ptsebe.
Spring
elevation
above Lake Huron and 2 'feet
above the flood water in the
Thedford Flats area. The water
first rises out of the channel
near the junction of the Ptsebe
and Old Ausable and covers the
flats on both sides of the river.
To the west it backs up the De-
fore Drain, across the Klondyke
road south of the Haig Farm
office and spills into Smith
Lake/ Part flows to the south
along the upper part of the De-
fore Drain and overflows the
New Road between Lots 20/21
and makes its way to the Cut
through the Teitzel Drain.
Summer floods as in the Thed
ford Flats are lower but equally
costly. In June, 19 47, water
rose to an elevation of 5 87 feet
covering about 900 acres, most
of which was in crop. (Two oth
er areas are also affected by
floods, although damage is not
excessive except: at Port Franks
where severe bank erosion has
harmed property. The other
is at Parkhill Village.)
the road be-
21 and to the
road. At this
waters of the
4,470
miles
small
over-
Ausable
which
old
head of the
water comes
Ausable below the
flood water reaches an
of 59 2 feet—12 feet
area
they are harvested. They are the
result entirely of excessive rain
fall over the watershed and in
the case of the Ausable, two and
one-half inches of continuous
rain, depending upon the amount
of moisture in the soil, will
create a flood condition in the
critical lands near the mouth of
the river. In fact, the heavy loss
of crops at this time of the year
is responsible more than any
other factor, for the urgency to
solve the flood problem on the
river.
(The flood control measure
now being considered by the Au
sable Authority deals exclusively
with the Parkhill Greek System
which floods the area owned by
Dr. L. C. Haigmeier. The latter’s
suit for damages to his property
by the 1947 flood was one ofby the 1947 flood was
the precipitants of the Report
and the formation of the
jty. A recent threat to proceed
with action on the suit, unless
evidence of correction measures
was shown, has spurred the
Authority to consider projects
along this system. The following
excerpt deals with the Parkhill
Creek System only and discusses
suggested flood control meas
ures. 1
Author-
Creek 1.2 miles above its con
fluence with the Old Ausable
River at Devil’s Elbow, an over
all distance of 9.56 miles. The
channel would be dredged and
widened uniformly from a 27-
foot bottom width at the upper
end to a 70-foot bottom width
at Grand Bend. Designed to
carry 10 feet of water through
out, the channel would have a
uniform slop of .014 per cent,
and at a lake level of 580.0 it
would safely discharge flows of
the 1947 summer flood magni
tude. Assuming that the excavat
ed material may be disposed of
along the banks, the estimated
cost (1949) would be $267,501.
McInnis Dam And Reservoir
To reduce the peak summer
flow of 2,470 c.f.s. to the pres
ent channel" capacity of the old
river bed would require approx
imately 4,000 acre feet of stor
age. rPhis amount of storage is
available at several points along
the upper part of the creek, but
the McInnis site being closest to
the flood problem would be the
most suitable one. The dam for
this reservoir would be located
about 1.5 miles southwest of
McInnis just east of the road
between Lots 20/21, Concession
6 of McGillivray Township. At
full capacity, the reservoir would
have 20 feet of water at the
dam and would extend back 3.0
miles on the north arm and 1.8
milest on the south arm, with a
total surface area of 54 0 acres.
This would be an earth-filled
controlled dam with n concrete
spillway section capable of dis
charging 5,190 c.f.s. Estimated
cost (1949) is $227,638.
(The Ausable Authority, at its
last meeting decided to ap
point an independent engineer to
determine costs and benefits
from a major dam near Parkhill.
As the report suggested, there
are other places suitable for
dams other than the McInnis
area and these sites will be in
vestigated by the engineer. Wil
liam Haugh of Hay, chairman of
the flood control advisory board
of the authority, is the munici
pal representative in charge of
this project.)
z
• Portable Arc Welding •>
• Acetylene Welding ®
• Steel Fabrication ®
• Machine Work ®
• Grinding ®
Marshall & Murray
Machine
EXETER ONTARIO
‘ap
t
r
n
H
t
i
'
i
E
H
n
i
i
t
i
i
i
t
i
i
t
n
i
u
i
i
t
i
i
m
t
m
t
n
i
i
n
m
i
i
t
H
t
i
i
i
i
t
t
t
i
H
u
'
i
i
j
n
i
n
m
u
t
u
i
u
u
n
t
n
!
— ■■■■■" . ........................................ H
S
H. J. CORNISH & CO.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Types Of Floods
Spring- Floods
Spring floods^ are the ___
severe as regards volume of wat
er. At this time of the year, the
ground is either sealed with
frost or saturated with moisture
and if snowfall has been exces
sive, the volume of water com
ing down i$. correspondingly
great. However, at this time of
the year the lands which are
subject to flooding are not in
crop; and while water becomes
a nuisance and creates hardship
in getting about, the entire
damage is not great to crop
as floods which occur during the
summer months. Such spring
floods, however, always carry a
certain amount of wilt which re
presents, for the most part, the
top soil of the farmlands far
ther up the valley. Such floods
are usually the cause of damage
at Port Franks.
Summer Flash Floods
Floods of this type occur per
iodically during the early spring
and summer after the crops ha.ve
been sown, or later on before Bend
most
Suggested Solutions
Means of regulating flood
flows in the Parkhill Creek Sys
tem would be reservoirs and
channel improvement. The flood
ing here is more extensive than
on the Ausable and will be more
difficult to handle owing to the
large uncontrolled portion of the
watershed (approximately 50%)
being situated below the trouble
area but which contributes to
the flooding of the latter and
also because
able storage
There are
into the Old
nel between
Parkhill Creek and Grand Bend.
These streams have an average
gradient of 17.5 feet per mile
giving rise to a very heavy run
off which soon fills the channel
to, and often beyond its capacity.
With the lower part of the chan
nel full, the flow from the up
stream areas is seriously ham
pered and the water is backed
up onto the low-lands in the vic
inity of Devil’s Elbow.
This old channel was
proved in 1929 from above the
tri-county bridge to Grand Bend,
a total distance of 9.5 miles, at
a total cost of $91,OK*. During
the twenty years since this im
provement the channel has been
silted up
places overgrown
The actual capacity of
nel has thereby been
ably reduced.
Thus it would see
provide increased flow in the
lower part of the Old Ausable
River channel and to build dams
and reservoir above to regulate
the flow into this part of the
Parkhill Creek system and j>rt-
vent flooding of the lowland.
Summer floods of the magni-
ture of the 194 7.. one have a
probable frequency of once in 1 2
years for the summer months
and every year for the spring
months at normal lake level. The
capacity of the Old Ausable
River channel at Grand Bend is
estimated 1,200 c.f.s. The peak
flow of the 194 7 summer flood
was approximately 2,4 70 c.f.s.
Therefore to prevent summer
floods of this magnitude it will
be necessary to (a) increase the
present channel capacity from
1,200 c.f.s. to 2,470 c.f.s. or (h)
provide a reservoir to reduce the
peak flood flow from 2,4 70 c.f.s.
to 1,200 c.f.s.
Less Old River Bed Improvemeinil
This plan would provide for
an improved channel from Grand
to a point on Parkhill
of the lack of suit-
above,
six creeks emptying
Ausable River chan-
its confluence with
irn-
considerably and in
with brush,
the ch an
con sid er-
logical io
LONDON, ONT.29 DUNDAS ST
W ant to Keep
YOUR Freedom?
We like to sing about this Canada of oujs being "the true
North rising free . It is a fine sentiment, and on the whole
.it has been quite true,
But our freedom is a thing which needs constant care lest
it die here as it lias died in so many other countries through
out history.
We cannot enjoy true freedom as a people unless we insist
upon personal freedom., We lose personal freedom, and so
contribute to the downfall of all freedom, every time we ask
Government to plan or regulate our lives.
•Collective bargaining: the right io dispose of our services
and our property as we see fit; the right to freedom of
assembly, speech and worship—all these we enjoy because
freedom-loving individuals fought and, if necessary, died
for them.
If we want t< keep cur freedom we must have the same
courage and resolution.
the STEEL COMPANY OF CANADA limited
Plants at
HAMILTON - BRANTFORD-SWANSEA - GANANOQUE - MONTREAL
Here You Are
Back To Old-Time Prices
YOU WILL NOT BELIEVE. IT UNTIL
SEE THESE PRICES WE HAVE FOR YOUYOU
Pants
Pants
Pants
5.95
6.95
7.95
Other Pants One-Third Off
Socks Half Price
a
::
I
a
Al
2-Pant Suits
k
2
1
2
g
S
1
s
s
s2
E
5 Folks!
Pre-War Prices
(We Mean tW 19'li4!-llS)liS War)
IF YOU MISS THESE PRICES YOU WILL KICK YOURSELVES
WHEN YOUR FRIENDS TELL YOU WHAT THEY GOT
Sport Coats .... 16.95
Pants To Match . 4.95, 5.95, 6.95
Shirts . . 1.19, 1.98,2.98,3.98
Casual Gab Jackets . One-Third Off
Top Coats (Jost a Few Left) 19.95 - 24.95
I
■■n—