HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 2012-11-08, Page 5THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2012. PAGE 5.
Allow me to introduce myself: I am
a bald male. Not bald as in ‘bald
eagle’ (the bird got a bad rap.
‘Balde’ is an antique word meaning
‘white’; so-called ‘bald’ eagles actually
get to spend their entire lives with a fine,
full head of handsome…well, feathers).
I digress.
I am, as I say, a mature male Homo sapiens
whose upper deck is shorn of shrubbery,
devoid of pelt, a filament-free zone. I did not
arrive at this state overnight, but rather
gradually, like a mighty oak shedding its
leaves – and not in one season – over several
years.
I have to confess, going bald wasn’t much
fun. I grew up in the Elvis Era, when
any young buck worth a dab of Brylcreem
sported a poufy ducktail and a greasy
pompadour imposing enough to qualify as a
traffic hazard. To a man, we dreamed of
owning a car, being a rock star and getting
laid. We did not entertain the notion of going
bald.
So actually going bald was somewhat
traumatic. Ah, but BEING bald? That’s been a
piece of cake. Let me enumerate a few of the
advantages:
Economy: I don’t spend a dime on
shampoos, conditioners, revitalizers, tints,
dyes, mousse or gel. You won’t find electric
hair dryers or straighteners or epilators in my
bathroom. Which of course means…
Less bathroom time: Know how I comb my
hair for an important event? With a damp
washcloth. One pass and Phhhhht! – I’m
cleared for takeoff.
The BS Factor: Here are two truisms.
Number one: There are, in fact, attractive-
looking people out there who actually
care whether their partners have ‘great hair’ or
not.
Number two: You don’t want to know them.
Think for a moment about the intellectual
depth of anyone who judges anyone else on
the basis of what’s growing north of their
eyebrows.
That’s not how you judge a person; that’s
how you judge a lawn.
Being bald frees you from the
time-consuming process of buying drinks
or dinner for someone and wasting an
evening discovering through conversa-
tion how vapid and superficial he or
she is.
Being bald is like having a social “Get Out
of Jail Free’ card.
And this just in (literally): a study conducted
by researchers at the University of
Pennsylvania’s Wharton School concludes
that bald men are actually perceived as
more powerful, more manly and even taller –
than men with hair.
Well, correction – not men who are merely
bald – men who actually shave their heads.
“The basic finding is that people view the
shaved head as a powerful looking look,” says
the study author Albert Mannes.
Uh huh. And what about guys on
their way to going bald, with wisps and
tufts and hair horseshoes around their
head?
Uh uh.
“Men with thinning hair were viewed as
least favourable” says Manning.
So there you have it, my little studlings.
You can have a polished pate like Patrick
Stewart or a hirsute noggin like Justin Trudeau
– but nothing in between.
Personally, and speaking as a guy who
has occupied both pedestals, I’d get out
the Bic disposable if I were you. Being
bald is easier, more hygienic, cheaper and, if
the Pennsylvania University study is correct,
the more virile way to go.
Nobody said it better than the British writer
Logan Pearsall Smith: “There is more felicity
on the far side of baldness than young men can
possibly imagine.”
Amen to that. Eat your heart out, hairballs.
Arthur
Black
Other Views ’Tis the season of the chrome-dome
With Friday’s cancellation of the NHL
Winter Classic, all hope that some
sort of hockey season could be
cobbled together seems to be lost. Since its
inception in 2008, the annual outdoor game has
become the league’s crown jewel game.
This year the league’s crown jewel was
polished to sparkle like never before as two
original six teams, the Toronto Maple Leafs
and the Detroit Red Wings, were set to do
battle at the University of Michigan’s “Big
House” a football stadium that holds over
100,000 people.
With the sheer marketability of the outdoor
game and the critically-acclaimed HBO series
24/7 broadcast for weeks leading up to the
game, the New Year’s Day tradition has
become something that millions of people, not
just hockey fans, look forward to.
And while the goal of the Winter Classic has
been to draw American fans into a traditionally
Canadian sport, this year’s inclusion of the
Maple Leafs, one of the most popular
franchises in all of sports (success not
included), there had been unprecedented buzz
surrounding the event.
It has been speculated that the plans will
simply be pushed back a year, with the
Toronto/Detroit Winter Classic to now take
place in early 2014, rather than 2013.
However, for many it’s just another (big) nail
in the coffin of this year’s hockey season.
Most hockey fans have lamented the
reasoning behind the argument keeping hockey
off the ice and the disagreement is no secret.
The argument is between the billionaires
(owners) and the millionaires (most players –
while there are plenty on either side of the
following number, before the current lockout,
the average salary of an NHL player was $2.4
million) while blue collar hockey fans are left
out in the cold.
Proposals are going back and forth and with
each offer there is a side being “insulted” by
the concessions they’re being asked to make.
Neither of these parties stand to really
“suffer” in the true sense of the word
regardless of which way the agreement falls. It
is, however, those on the fringe of the game
who stand to lose everything.
It’s the bar owners who play host to empty
rooms with no hockey to broadcast, or the
concession stand workers at these arenas that
now sit lifeless, or those with sports apparel
businesses left with a large hole in their sales
as consumers boycott the NHL by refusing to
patronize them any longer.
A lot of people forget the boom that comes
along with hosting a Winter Classic game.
“Detroit the Biggest Loser in Winter Classic
Cancellation” read a story by the CBC.
The City of Detroit and the community
surrounding it (the University of Michigan’s
‘Big House’ is actually in Ann Arbor) was set
to benefit from an infusion of tens of millions
of dollars from a week’s worth of hockey
games and events. Now, an area that could
really use some good news in its financial
pages is left out in the cold again.
After visiting Detroit several times
throughout the baseball playoffs (yes, I went to
a World Series game and yes, it was freezing) I
have to wonder how a walk through that
community would change some minds.
Perhaps holding a bargaining meeting in
downtown Detroit would give the players and
owners a new perspective on things and once
they saw how bad some people have it, maybe
the numbers being volleyed back and worth
wouldn’t be as “insulting” as they have been in
New York and Toronto boardrooms.
Losing touch
Shawn
Loughlin
Shawn’s Sense
Travelling to and from Brampton most
weekends has given me a lot of time to
indulge some of my more eclectic radio
listening habits.
As I’ve mentioned before, I do enjoy
listening to CBC Radio. While it is nice
having intellectual stimulation during a drive,
the biggest bonus I get from the station is that
I don’t ever have to concern myself with
changing it; I haven’t run into a program or
song on the station that turns me off a listening
experience as thoroughly as some pop music
that I’ve reached over and changed the station.
That means that, for more than two hours, I
can focus on driving and listen to something
interesting.
Last Sunday I was listening to Tapestry with
Mary Hynes. Hynes was interviewing Tim
Kreider, author of a New York Times essay
called The Busy Trap which talks about how
inundated people have become with life’s
schedule.
I can’t really connect with Kreider. As a
writer and cartoonist he freely admitted on the
show that his parents indulged his creativity
most of his life by paying his way. I don’t
begrudge him that benefit nor do I begrudge
my parents for me not having it. All I can say
is that I really can’t connect with him on a
personal level because of that.
However, I can connect with his writing. He
talks about how he doesn’t always answer the
question of “How are you?” with “Busy.” He
says that far too many people are having that
busy problem. Me, I discovered the cure to
that problem a long time ago.
When I was in school I had my brain poked
and prodded until they declared that I (for all
intents and purposes since there isn’t a
physical test to determine this) had Attention
Deficit Disorder and possibly Attention Deficit
Hyperactivity Disorder.
This opened some doors for me that
otherwise may have not been opened. Things
were offered to me like note takers, but one of
the biggest changes that was made was one
that was left up to me: course load.
For university students, a 100 per cent
course load is (or was) five courses at 15 hours
a week (for class time). Of course, the rest of
your time was supposed to be spent reading
and preparing for your courses.
It was suggested that I would do better with
an 80 per cent course load and, looking back
on my decisions, they were right.
For one semester I took an 80 per cent
course load and felt somehow unengaged. I
took a 120 per cent course load the next and
began to realize how in over my head I was at
that point.
Had my courses all been different, I
probably would have been fine but, as with
many first year courses, you’re looking at the
basics of things to fill in the holes (or gaping
chasms) your high school education may have
left.
It became far too easy to forget what I was
learning where.
That was when I learned to place true value
on the time you had that wasn’t claimed. I
eventually settled for an 80 or 100 per cent
course load depending on how close I was to
my degrees, but I took every opportunity I had
to hang out with my roommates, even if that
meant cancelling some shifts at the call centre
I worked at to play road hockey in our back
yard (which was nearly 80 per cent cement).
Suffice to say I learned then, and continue to
learn all the time, that having free time should
not be something you feel bad about.
If you have a few extra hours to yourself,
you don’t need to immediately fill them up
with another volunteer position or some oft-
ignored (because it’s unimportant) chore.
Busyness is good when you need it. It can
give you that extra surge of adrenaline to
continue working hard. On the other hand, if
you spent all your time being busy, only
stopping what you’re doing to consider what
you’re doing next, it won’t be long until you’re
a frazzled ball of nervous energy always
worried about where the next task will be
coming from.
Listening to Kreider, I came to realize that I
am like him in one way; when people ask me
if I’m busy, I can usually say no.
Aside from refereeing soccer and my job, I
have very little to keep my nights filled.
Without children, a second job or an unhealthy
amount of volunteer positions, I find myself
able to put my feet up a couple days a week or
hang out with my friends and it’s important
that I do that.
Why is that so important? Well it goes back
to another editorial I wrote about my new drive
to work: it provides a buffer zone.
Hanging out with my friends, for me, can
take the form of playing online video games,
playing board games, watching movies or
playing dominoes.
Things can get pretty heated among us all,
but the important thing to remember is that we
all are having enough fun that we come back
time after time to play together because it’s a
good way to unwind.
It provides me with a place and a time to
unwind that isn’t tied to a particular time or a
particular place, if that makes sense to you.
Anyway, I know I have, on previous
occasions, talked about the importance of
slowing down and letting the world pass you
by so that you can see what it looks like, but
this is a bit different.
This is about not having to take that time out
of your schedule.
That time of reflection, release and
relaxation needs to be something that happens
organically from time to time because forcing
it just doesn’t work.
So if you feel your schedule starting to
tighten up to the point where you answer every
question with some variation of “I’m busy, but
sure,” remember that you need to take time for
yourself.
After all, when you face down whatever
personification of death you believe in, I can
nearly guarantee that, unless you work for a
toy or game company, you won’t regret
spending time out of the office.
How am I doing? Well, not real busy
Denny
Scott
Denny’s Den