Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 2012-10-11, Page 20PAGE 20. THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2012.Continued from page 1that says wind turbines do affectproperty assessment,” Melady toldcouncillors. The studies cited properties in Wolfe Island, Amaranth and Huron- Kinloss, among others. With how many wind turbines are planned for Huron County, Melady said, it would be foolish to think the same scenario would not play itself out in the area, including in Huron East. MacLellan said that if the municipality could show exact data on a decrease in property values, they may stand a chance in protecting residents from potential adverse affects from wind turbines, but the bylaw would have to be a sort of “good neighbour” bylaw and couldn’t deal explicitly with wind turbines. MacLellan said the practice is not uncommon in other areas of development. He used an example of a condo building in Toronto that was deemed to reduce the quality and enjoyment that residents could get from their property (an adjacent condo building) and the owner of the new building was forced to recoup the existing building its losses. “I don’t see this as being a problem,” MacLellan said. “It would just be putting people back on even ground.” The timing of a potential bylaw, however, was questioned, as members of HEAT said they would like to see a bylaw in place as soon as possible, to precede any turbine development. “This needs to be in place pre- wind turbine construction,” said Ryan. “I think it will be a lot harder after the fact.” MacLellan said a potential bylaw would have to be blanket legislation that would cover residents if any kind of industry or neighbour comes in and decreases the property value of a neighbour. Councillor David Blaney agreed with the intent of the potential bylaw, but thought an actual bylawwouldn’t be necessary, saying thatsomething like causing a decrease inproperty values could fall under “common law”. Councillor Bill Siemon said he’d like to see studies and situations that wind turbines companies have alleged exist proving that turbines can increase the value of a property. In addition, he questioned who could be sued under a bylaw like the one being suggested, asking if it’s the companies who should recoup surrounding property owners, or if it should be those providing leases to the companies. “Perhaps they should be suing the people who are making the money out of this,” Siemon said. Deputy-Mayor Joe Steffler said it should be a bylaw that would essentially fall under common courtesy to your neighbours, whether it’s in a rural setting or in town. Operating on suggestion of their lawyers, members of HEAT were planning on having low frequency noise studies as well as property appraisals completed on their properties in order to establish a current property value. This would provide an accurate base to refer back to after turbines have been installed, Ryan said. He asked councillors if the costs that would be incurred by those procedures would be able to be recouped through the municipality’s cost recovery bylaw, which is already in place. Ryan said they were prepared to pay for the checks themselves, but that they would be incurring significant costs in anticipation of the presence of wind turbines. MacLellan said that would have to be discussed with the municipality’s solicitor. “It’s a bit of a burden,” Ryan said. Chief Administrative Officer Brad Knight said he wanted to caution council against jumping straight to legal counsel before meeting with staff on the issue, in order to not incur significant legal fees.Knight said a lot of newinformation had been brought tostaff that night and staff should be given some time to review it and make some recommendations before going to the municipality’s lawyer. Councillor Les Falconer, however, was worried about the negative effects that such a bylaw may have, including scaring away any industry that may be considering Huron East as a setting. He said if a bylaw is in place that would put industry on the hook for noise or smells that neighbours maydeem to be unpleasant, it could deterbusiness from considering HuronEast as a location in the future, if it were to be passed. The remaining three points the group wished to bring up, however, were issues council felt had already been addressed, such as credible measurements before a building permit could be issued. Chief Building Official Paul Josling had already assured the group, at a meeting earlier this year, that a credible property assessment is necessary before he would signoff on any building permit, as it iswith any structure requiring abuilding permit. To prepare a bylaw to the effect of what Josling is already required to do by law, MacLellan said, would be redundant. MacLellan said with how “swamped” staff was at the moment, it is likely that recommendations would come back to council for the first meeting of November, which would be held on Tuesday, Nov. 6. HEAT members curious about cost recovery bylaw A reunion of sorts Members of both the Fire Department of North Huron and the Gravenhurst Fire Department were in Goderich last week to honour the late John Black, former chief of the Fire Department of North Huron. Black was honoured as the county’s top firefighter. Accepting the award on John’s behalf were his brother David and David’s wife Joanne. (Photo submitted)