Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 2012-02-09, Page 10PAGE 10. THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2012.Councillor livid after ‘discovered’ money revealed School petition being circulated throughout Blyth Vodden questions ownership of school THE EDITOR, It’s clean up time once and for all. Huron County and its council: What does the general public really know about it? Not enough. County Council is made up of mostly mayors and deputy- mayors of the member municipalities (plus or minus four more depending on when they’re done arguing about it.) This council is responsible for a corporation with over 600 employees and an annual budget of over $100 million dollars of ratepayer money to provide services to the public. In a typical council meeting there are always one or two councillors sound asleep through most of the proceedings, and a few more rarely read the materials in preparation for the meeting. (Meetings are public, attend one time for some good entertainment.) That leaves about half of them well informed and ready to govern … and therein lies the problem. It appears that the largest employer in Huron County, funded by the public purse is: • Left to run itself in large parts with no efficient oversight by council. • Fostering a sense of entitlement amongst key employees rather than awareness that a service is provided to the public and that the public is footing the bill for their wages. • Lacking internal controls and transparency. • Ambiguous in its relationship to property owned by the county and hence the public when it comes to disposing of it. • Tolerating department heads padding their annual budgets. • Running on the principle that if you kick up enough fairy dust council will just let things be and the same old show goes on and on. How dare I arrive at these conclusions? Well, how else is it possible that somebody just “discovered” $1.7 million in taxpayer money in a health board savings account that nobody knew about? Why does the warden have to send the department heads back to rebudget and to only reflect the upcoming years true costs in that budget? How else can it be explained that once the tornado hit, managing staff found it more important to finish attending a conference and some were extremely worried about not having access to their custom clubs stuck in the courthouse, leaving concerned staff on site scratching their heads? It is high time for county council to wake up, take the reigns and show some responsibility to the public and take some of that “newfound” money and conduct a thorough forensic audit of the financial affairs of the Corporation of Huron County. The return on that investment will be significant. It is council’s responsibility to clean up this mess once and for all and actually understand the budgets and financials they are voting on. It’s the people’s money! Burk Metzger, Clinton. THE EDITOR, Any day now we can expect an announcement that Avon Maitland District School Board (AMDSB) is prepared to dispose of Blyth Public School. According to regulations, North Huron will be granted an opportunity to submit an offer to purchase this property within 90 days at fair market value. So, fairness is now to be an element of this proposed deal. Fairness is not a word I can easily associate with Avon Maitland as a result of what they have done for us (and to us) recently, but I guess it depends on whether they are dishing it out or demanding something from us. And “market value”! Which market value will they be referring to? The market value which existed before the school board declared our school surplus, or the rapidly declining market value of all Blyth real estate since their announcement? There is another perplexing aspect of this situation. The first Blyth Public School on this site was built and paid for by the Village of Blyth residents, under the leadership of our very own school board in 1896. The land, the Blyth Fair Grounds, was donated to the school board by the village. The present school building was built, I am sure, with some provincial grants, but local ratepayers put up the remainder of the cost. I don’t recall any mention of AMDSB ever buying this school. In a moral sense, we see this as our school, not the property of the board. Should they not simply return it to the original owner? In any case, if this community wants this property, it is going to be cash on the barrel head. At market value! No monetary breaks for us as a result of our “sense of ownership” of this building and historic piece of land, no advantage over land speculators from places unknown, no sign of compensation for the economic and social losses we will be experiencing by the loss of our school. We realize that the school board is no friend of this community; the Ministry of Education is against us; the Ontario Education Act offers us no right to appeal this unfair decision. Our only recourse is to convince the Ontario legislature to THE EDITOR, We’ve experienced a lot of pent up frustration in rural Ontario, which was probably brewing for some time anyway. And it wasn’t only about wind farms. The outcome of the provincial election demonstrated that it was as much about a need for change and focus, as it was about a referendum on how things are. And as long as we don’t stand up for what’s right, and fair, and reasonable, they (whoever THEY seem to be) will continue to do what they do. Silence in public debate is considered acceptance and apathy is encouraged. So it has been with this school closure issue...until fairly recently, however. If I hear the phrase, “well that’s the way things are” ever again, my head will explode. Things are the way they are because we accept that that’s the normal order of things. It’s my opinion that things are the way they are because we allow them to be that way. In the past several months, grass-roots organizations have formed across the province, to share information and a common cause to stop the closing of schools across the province until reasonable people review reasonable solutions. It seems that there has been no funding to maintain schools and keeping them vital community assets. It’s also agreed that schools help to sustain neighbourhoods and communities. So while there’s been funding to award incentives for school busing contracts, and to build new schools, there’s little for maintenance of existing schools. While one provincial ministry works to develop programs to help sustain communities like ours, another seems intent on working in the opposite direction. The Ministry of Education has hired “independent” facilitators (who were once employees) to review and answer the challenges of those who have openly opposed indiscriminate school closing decisions. These reviews have, without fail, concluded that the local school boards acted appropriately, and followed, their own policy. No surprise there. So even if the policy is flawed, as long as its followed it, it’s o.k. A quote from one of the “independent” reports to the ministry cited: “the entire focus of the Accommodation Review Committee is to ‘feed information to the boards (sic) senior staff’ not to the affected communities or the elected trustees” kind of clarifies the position of the independent nature of these reviews. And you wonder why many do not accept these decisions without challenge. To be fair, these independent reports can only address whether a process was followed in accordance with policy, not whether the policy was flawed. So, even if it’s wrong, it’s o.k., as long as process was followed. The former Wellington-Perth MPP John Wilkinson was quoted prior to the last election as saying, “in principle, there should always be people who are elected who can hold the decision makers to account. That is why we have school board trustees, municipal councils and Members of Provincial Parliament.” Blyth, Brussels, Zurich, Moonstone, Long Lake, Wanup, Peterborough, Cobalt, Duntroon, Kirkland Lake, Niagara, Holmesville...and many more may have something to say about that. The Premier of Ontario, before he was Premier, was quoted as saying, “...the province should avoid forcing closures while the funding formula is under review...we’re going to regret having closed schools prematurely when we could have kept them open.” That quote was recorded June 11, 2002. The funding formula, with a review promised in 2010, is still under review, 10 years after that statement. The legislation is broken, the process is flawed; both need fixing. Currently, it has provided a “get of out jail free” card for school boards. Fixing this is long overdue and only the louder voice of the people can bring about that change. Can you imagine the field day the Ontario Ombudsman would have, if he was allowed to review the content of both the public as well as the closed meetings which took place in all these jurisdictions. Imagine what real estate people are now saying about the future of real estate values in Blyth and other affected areas. Imagine how Municipal Property Assessment Corporation will be assessing our properties for property tax purposes. Imagine what the property tax revenue implications are for the municipality of North Huron. There is a petition being circulated in the Village of Blyth beginning this week. And folks, silence is not an option. “Change is brought about because ordinary people do extraordinary things.” – Barack Obama, President of the United States. Regards, Greg Sarachman, Blyth. Letters to the Editor IS THIS A CRIME SCE N E ? No one should ever be pressured, forced or tricked into giving money — even to loved ones. If someone you trust is taking advantage of you, help is out there. Learn the signs of financial abuse to protect yourself and the people you love. To find out more from the Government of Canada about preventing elder abuse, visit www.seniors.gc.ca or call 1 800 O-Canada (1-800-622-6232) TTY: 1-800-926-9105 Continued on page 23