HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 2013-12-19, Page 5THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2013. PAGE 5.
Can I tell you about my career as a
photojournalist? Won’t take long
because it didn’t last long – about 11
seconds, as I recall.
I had the equipment – a nice 35-millimetre
Pentax. I had the location – a mountain village
in rural Spain. I had a customer – The Globe
and Mail was buying travel pieces from me. I
even had the occasion. Generalissimo
Francisco Franco had just croaked and I had a
chance to record what the passing of the long-
time dictator meant to at least some of his
countrymen. I decided a photograph of one of
the townspeople – a barefoot peasant in a
battered straw hat who was astride a burro
shambling down a rocky path toward me –
would make a compelling illustration for my
story. I raised my camera; the peasant raised
his right forefinger and wagged it
disapprovingly.
And I caved. I baled. I chickened out. I
lowered my camera and grinned
apologetically. Clearly I wasn’t tough enough
to be a photojournalist.
Back then, attitudes towards photos
taken without permission were a good deal
crisper than they are today. In 2013 we
all have our pictures taken by complete
strangers dozens of times daily. Surveillance
cameras snap our profiles in bank lineups,
corner stores, at gas pumps – even at
stoplights. It is a completely unwarranted and
unsanctioned intrusion of our privacy but
it happens so often we don’t even think
about it.
My computer guru was helping me retrieve
some files on my laptop and I happened to
mention that tiny Cyclopean eye that sits front
and centre on most laptop screens – the camera
lens. He chuckled and said “I can’t tell you
how many clients I deal with who’ve put duct
tape over that lens.”
Meaning what? That some people think their
own computers are spying on them? What
would be the point? What would a spy see
through that lens? In my case he’d see a bald
guy with a red face saying bad words about the
laptop that just ate his e-mail.
Hard to see how that would enhance the
CSIS database of terrorist activity in Canada.
I’m saying CSIS but choose your own
initials? CSA, FBI, CIA, RCMP – who knows
who’s snooping out there?
Recently I attended an anti-oil tanker rally in
a local park. I was having a hard time hearing
the Raging Grannies because of a high-pitched
droning sound from overhead. I looked up
and saw...a drone, I guess. A weird gizmo
about the size of a crow with four stiff wings
that swept back and forth about 20 feet above
the crowd. It wasn’t camouflaged; as a matter
of fact it looked sort of like a model airplane –
except every few seconds it would stop and
hover.
The better to take photographs, I have to
conclude.
So who was manning the controls on that
drone – the protest organizers? Some
municipal crowd control bureaucrat? A
constable from the local RCMP unit?
All I know is, nobody identified themselves.
And nobody asked my permission.
Well I know something else. The next time I
pass a surveillance camera – at the bank, at the
gas pump, wherever – I plan to emulate that
Spanish peasant who held up his forefinger to
me years ago.
But I’ll be using a different finger.
Arthur
Black
Other Views
Photojournalist interrupted Shawn
Loughlin
Shawn’s Sense
Once upon a time I laughed at
circumstances of censorship,
especially those that plagued PG-13
movies played on cable channels.
I’m sure some readers know what I’m
talking about. One of the best examples I can
think of is Bruce Willis’ John McClane
character in the Die Hard Trilogy... er
anthology I guess would be a better term now.
McClane’s famous line of yippee-kay-yay
mother... while, I can’t type the rest of it due to
censorship, but rest assured, it’s just as vulgar
as it could be.
Now, I’m not saying swear words shouldn’t
be beeped out on television or in songs on the
radio. What I am going to say, however, is that
beeping is far preferable to the alternative;
dubbing over.
McClane’s famous line is now infamous
because of a horrible dub done to cover up the
swear word. It is now known as yippee ki-yay
Mister Falcon.
Weird Science (and yeah, you’re probably
going to get a good idea of my bad taste in
movies by reading the rest of these examples)
was another film that underwent the
censorship dubbing and went so far as to
replace words like bang with boom. The
replacements in that film stretched from the
over-cautious to the ridiculous. The term
“they’re going to freak out” was even dubbed
to “they’re going to flip out” for some
unknown reason.
Ghostbusters, RoboCop, The Godfather, The
Big Lebowski and others have faced the same
ridiculous dubbing to replace potentially
offensive words.
As stated before, I found these humorous
and thought it ridiculous they didn’t just beep
out the words, but censors have been digging
further and further.
Looking to music nowadays, it’s difficult to
find a song, let alone an entire album, without
an offensive language warning. That is, unless,
you’re hearing the radio edit (referring to those
songs that have had their content changed, not
those that have been shortened for radio play).
Likely the most famous edit in recent
memory is Cee Lo Green’s Forget You, which
went so far as to change the title from the ‘F’
word to Forget.
While it seems like a completely normal
thing to do, especially since the song was
featured on the main-stream, prime-time
television hit show Glee, I found that, once I
had heard the original, the dubbed version just
didn’t hold up to the same intensity.
Telling someone that you’re going to forget
them because they’ve wronged you seems a
heck of a lot more tame than telling them
something using more vulgar language.
Again, I’m not saying that the ‘F’ word, or
any other curse word, should be yelled loudly
over the radio or prime-time television but,
when you’re dealing with a medium which is
purely auditory, changing the words can have
a big effect on the message.
With Green’s hit, it changes it from
someone being very angry with a former
sweetheart and their current significant other
to someone who is moving on after a
relationship went south.
Some changes, like James Blunt’s You’re
Beautiful, which had the ‘F’ word changed to
flying, fits fine without really affecting the
final message of the song.
D12, a rap group featuring Eminem,
however, had an entire song changed for radio
play. Their popular tune Purple Hills was
originally called Purple Pills and featured
drug references, profanity and inappropriate
lyrics.
In some cases, a radio edit can be done
properly and tastefully. In other cases, like
with D12’s example, the song might not be fit
for general public consumption. In still other
cases, the edit changes the entire tone of the
song and an alternative, like a simple beeping
of the swear word, needs to be considered.
However, I guess some of it is as a result of
trying to avoid not having music on the radio
at all. Most people know of songs that were
removed from radio play after the September
11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States.
Songs like John Lennon’s Imagine were put on
a no-play list not because of any particular
lyric but because they portrayed a world vision
that clashed with the vision being chased by
those in power.
(The danger behind Imagine in particular
has never been fully explained to me and I
doubt it ever will.)
Some changes are just completely off the
wall.
In searching for songs that had unnecessary
radio edits, I turned up a few like Nicki
Minaj’s Starships.
(Please do not take this as a suggestion to
listen to Nicki Minaj, I do not endorse any of
the musicians in the column).
Minaj’s song has her saying her name,
Onika, which some censors felt was too close
to a racial slur. It was taken out of the song and
replaced with silence.
The Black Eyed Peas referenced satellite
radio in their song Boom Boom Pow. Satellite
radio is made popular by the fact that they
don’t face the same strict restrictions that
standard radio stations do. That said, standard
radio stations weren’t going to play anything
that gave a shout-out to their competitor so
now the song just says “radio.”
Lightning Crashes, a song by Live had the
term placenta edited out likely because people
didn’t want to explain it to their kids. You
know, because kids have no idea what physical
relationships are by the time they’re listening
to music.
And lastly, in Sir Mix-a-Lot’s timeless
classic, Baby Got Back, censors edited out a
line where he told women with healthy figures
to dial 1-900-Mix-A-Lot. They replaced the 1-
900 part with a beep. I guess they were
worried kids would dial the number and cost
their parents a lot of money.
Regardless, censorship is out of control. Art
is being changed by what is allowed and what
is not allowed to be said.
Heck, even new songs like Icona Pop’s I
Don’t Care are being fundamentally changed,
in my opinion, by replacing what could be
considered crass terms with more polite terms.
I’m not going to get into details, but go listen
to it online and compare it to the version I’m
sure you’ve heard on the radio on your drive
into work in the morning. I know I can’t not
hear it if I’m in the car for more than 15
minutes.
The original has more grab, more dare and
more assertiveness to it. The edited version
paints a different picture.
Denny
Scott
Denny’s Den
Censorship gone wild and wrong
A truly nasty man
Very quietly and in front of very few
viewers, Toronto Mayor Rob Ford
made his most hateful and shocking
claim yet: suggesting a Toronto Star reporter
may be a pedophile.
On a Vision TV program hosted by disgraced
media baron Conrad Black, Ford cited his May,
2012 run-in with Star reporter Daniel Dale as
the highest level of media meddling he has
experienced.
“The worst one was Daniel Dale in my
backyard taking pictures. I have little kids,”
Ford told Black on the program, which aired
twice last week. “When a guy’s taking pictures
of little kids, I don’t want to say the word, but
you start thinking, you know, what’s this guy
all about?”
As Ford said, he didn’t want to “say the
word” but the implication is not up for debate;
everyone knows what the disgraced mayor was
driving at.
In a response to Ford’s interview, Dale wrote
a piece for the newspaper on Dec. 11
disagreeing with a number of Ford’s
statements. Dale claims he took just one
picture that night, of a park adjacent to Ford’s
home, and it was deleted. He claimed to never
be in Ford’s backyard, or peering over its
fence. Police reports back Dale’s version of the
events, which ended with Ford grabbing Dale
and holding his fist just inches from Dale’s
face while demanding his Blackberry (which
he planned on using to take pictures).
“I stand by every word I said with Mr. Black
in my interview,” Ford would later say.
In his piece for the Star, Dale says he has
received legal advice after Ford’s “libelous”
statements and has filed a lawsuit.
While Ford has been far from considerate
during his years in office, the majority of his
stupidity has simply harmed himself and his
family.
He has been on the warpath against the
Toronto Star for years, calling reporters
“pathological liars” and “maggots” along the
way, but reporters were eventually vindicated
by police reports and Ford’s own confessions.
This statement, however, is a horse of a
different colour and everybody knows it.
In this age of the internet, Dale is right when
he says accusations of pedophilia, no matter
how baseless, will stick to him forever.
So when Ford, whose hands are about as far
from clean as they can get, makes these claims
against Dale, they threaten his career, his
livelihood and his personal life forever more.
But as long as Ford (in his mind) comes out of
the interview looking a little bit better, that’s all
he cares about.
He doesn’t care how many bodies he leaves
in his wake, he’s made that clear. He has
dragged his wife into his mess, his family, his
fellow councillors and the people of Toronto,
all because he (admittedly) drinks too much
and has dabbled in crack cocaine.
Dale, by all accounts, has kept his nose
clean, he’s been good at his job and he’s made
something of himself. Ford, on the other hand,
has found himself embroiled in scandal after
scandal, all of which are of his own creation.
Sure, he has been elected by the people of
Toronto a number of times and, by some
accounts, has had a successful political career,
but he will be forever remembered as the hard-
drinking, crack-smoking mayor of Toronto
who makes racist and homophobic comments
and has “more than enough to eat at home”.
Hopefully everyone will see through Ford’s
latest attempt to drag an upstanding citizen into
the mud, where Ford, a proven liar time and
again, has made his living.