HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Exeter Times-Advocate, 1936-04-16, Page 7THE EXETER TIMES-ADVOCATE THURSDAY, APHW 1930
WORM IB
till
*
water-witch!first class
*
**
hut there some things worth keepingare
**
There ismen.
If t!he Emperor of Ethiopia should
’36 bids fair to keep
$ *
present job, right
teacher -of nations
* * *
the
and
and
He
was
* *
* ** *
And those little patches of green grass and those little flowers
under the hedges. We’re- watching for green blades in the flower
bebs.
Welcome home fox’ the holidays,
*
It’s too bad for the owners of those costly evaporators.
»»**»***
pledges! History honours such
as the Judgement Day!
* *
June December’s snow.
* * * * *
« *
Planted those weet peas?
* # $
♦ *
♦ * ♦
♦ *
« * * ♦
* ♦ *
V ** ®
Exeter is badly in need of a
# ft ft
* *
********
Be good, deal’ heart, and let nations who will break theii’
such an occasion
lose his
thinking people should set him up as a first class
and rulers in the matter of treaty observance and pledge honouring.
Good Friday’s prevailing wind was Northeast to East. U-r-r-h!
Nope! Wre’ve not been sucker fishin’ so far!
Is the weather in mourning because the Exeter Eligible Maid
ens are not living up to their Leap Year possibilities?
********
Exeter High School Reports
Abbott, Eleanor—2nd CO 55; 2nd OC 450;
FORM IA
ILA FR CO LI BH AD BO GE AR
Abbott, Eleanor ........................... 43 82 29 80 56
Andrew, Eileen ............................ 32 47 64 63 3 8 0 38 60 37
Bierling, Andrew .......................... 28 63 44 35 37 <69 35 46 40
Caldwell, Olive ............................... 31 61)52 40 28 54 27 46 46
Clarke, Margaret ........................... 67 72 76 46 613 65 61 69 64
Gaiser, Ada .................................... 42 64 64 51 39 29 55 5 4 73
Gordon, Murray ........................... 41 54 72 7‘5 6'6'68 53 81 59
Gordon, Richard ........................... 91 90 88 79 69 88 84 ■82 73
Hicks, Stanley ........ .................. 43 62 76 69 5'5'33 ab 76 47
Moore, Freda ........................28 52 22 17 19 50 55 53
Morgan, Helen .............. .......... 35 '69 80 GQ 61 40 63 78 70
Morlock, Burma ........................... 30 51 48 52 28 12 47 59 44
Oestricher, Eunice ........................ 76 85 68 '5 8 61 94 92 86 88
Perkins, Ivan .......................80 •61 59 73 84 93 60
Robins, Elsie- .........................51 88 48 45 23 90 39 61 61
Sims, Labelle ................................5 5 77 60 159 6-5 5 3 60 79 50
S/uthcott, Robert ........................ 82 92 68 68 72 50 74 74 60
Stanbury, Richard ........................ 45 81 66 76 70 54 64 73 5 0
Stebbins, Mona ........................... 43 75 68 50 34 60 60 54 76
Turnbull, Robert ........................... 74 96 80 69 60 98 71 77 ,63
Stire, Carl ..............................52 37 25 38 32 53 52
Appleton, Jean
Beekier, Grace
Brooke, Irene
Campbell, Marilyn
Dixon, Janet ........
Frayne, Stanley ...
Gaiser, Lois ........
Harvey, Leonard .
Hicks, Clifford ...
Hicks, Frank .......,
Hockey, Thelma .,
Hopcroft, Ruth ...
Kestle, Jack..........
Kleinstiver, Lome
Jones, Hazel ....
Lawson, Evelyn
Lawson, Gerald
Luxton, Fred ...
Moore, Murray
Powe, Audrey ..
Prouty, Milford
Restemeyer, Donald .
Russell, Patricia ....
Skinner, Ross ............
Smith, John ...............
Walker, Alden ...........
LA FR CO EL BI-I AL BO GE AR BK
........ 81 87 64 85 67 61 48 79 64 94
*»«.. .«. 87 93 76 84 71 84 71 88 71 85
78 32 9 24 69
. 57 71 52 75 74 10 51 78 "43
,, .... 89 89 52 81 62 76 51 83 66
5'8'84 78 45 88 52 62 55 86
. 47 6i4 >5-6 5'5’24 22 52 60 75 75
. 57 70 64-53 48 37'52 77 37 44
30 58 84 69 38 42 38 67 57 67
68 56 76 54 '50 47 84 ■63 65
6'6 76.79 45 85 48 71 71 71
45 53 60 58 23 5'4 28 44 42 ■50
66 84 88 80 ;5'7 94 ab 83 70
. ....:6l2 68 72 15 8 53 75 70 79 58 71
51 78 56 52 25 64 44 69 64 46
69 81 68 61 55 50 7'5 83 78 91
40 94 60 50 39 50 28 •6(6 42 72
71 91 '7 6 83 73 97 184 90'58 69
48 48 34 31 42
34 62 68 74 517 51 43 ,'6|2 58
52 59 '52 82 45 l6l 58 73 50
53 82 15 6 51 41 100 75 71 65 50
91 90 89 90 76 82 73 85 80 9 9.
47 50 60 '61 3'8 51 48 60 69
36 52 71 71 28 82 83 71 82
54 43 48 50 57 50 75 53
FORM II
CI LA FR EG E|D AR GE.ZO PH CO O'C
78 76 86 92 68 92 73 75 73 78 68
55 75 83 77 25 89 4i8'516'38 57 45
68'77 90 90 3 6 70 62 58 54 68
65 58 70-68 66 51 36 68 69
82 23 65 63 80'73 44 62 68 61 70
65 41'49 43 61 61 40 63 48 49
50 38 I5i9 30 4 50 45
53 41'62 51 62 53 27 50 52
75 47 53 82 64 61 53 65 69 i59 64
7'7’6|3 78 77 '65 64 81 86 78 67 65
85 68 78 81 80 5 8'81 165 63 70 74
■80 53 6.1 75 79 82 41 6-6 59 70 70
85 89 88 87 42 76 81 64 50 71 54
53 68 75 59 62 68 39 40 50 55
55 40-32 25 26 50'31 50 58
65 36 71 •69 59 69 62 75 57 65 65
68 55 66 71 72 '5'7 3.2 5 6 50
93 16 45 64 65 66 66 58 44 57 54
73 35 163 78 '6'2 94 74 61 5>8 70 57
58 30 53 74 60 6151 53 50 50
53 150 46 32 26 55 21 61 59
83 85 88 88 53 81 80 80 8l6(63 5'8
70 ab 79 68 84 57 72 60
47 ab 65 55 54 34 51 59
67 42 7'8'65 ab 65 77 61 56
. 92 45 7)6 84 79 89 90 63 68 60 60
97 73 &2 92 68 81i 76 s69 80 67 80
77 25 86 85 150 65 <6'7 71 35 78 75
77 69 •72 70 6T 60 50 63
85 59 7 6 76 7'8 66 <68 63 69 75
52 40 54 9 47 56 33 52 54
83 33 53 70 76 73 89 70 •6-2 71 64
67 ab 39 ab 70 ab ■5 4 53
55 63 70 41 58 47 '55 60
37 37 50 29 50 50
st AL 30;Clarke, June,BO-66, AIL 83; Elliot,Ho-
LA 61, 1st FR 88;•Fisher, Ferrol, B’O 79,AR 69;
b.; 'Stebbins, Eileen, OH- 3 8;White AVlnnifred,BH
None of us want war,
even at the cost of war.
Beaver Laurene ,
Campbell, Gerald
Christie, Laverne
Clark, June .........
Delbridge, Ralph
Elliot, Harold .....
Elliot, Howard ....
Fisher, Ferrol ....
Grieve, Helen .....
Hern, Laurene ...
Hogarth, Betty ...
Kydd, Ethel ........
Kerslake, Josie ...
Lee, Frederick ....
Lindenfield, Alvin
Melvill, Margaret
McDonald, Clarence
McFalls, Gerald
Prouty, Stewart
Sanders, Hilton
Smith, Stanley
Snell, Grace ....
.Snell, Orville ..
Squire, Ronald
Stebbins, Eileen ..
Taylor, Grant ......
Taylor, Ruth ........
Traquair, Dorothy
Waghorn, Harry ..
Webb, Ilene ........
White, Winnifred
Winer, Donald .....
Wolf, Murray .......
*Moise, Jack ........
Squire, Grafton ...
Christie, Lavenre Is
ward, BO 3 2, GE 47, 1st 1
Squire, Ronald 1st LA at., ------ -------- ------ ------- -------- ----
32; Wolf, Murray BI-I 50; Moise Jack 1st LA 83, 1st FR 94; Squire, Graf
ton 1st BO 64; 1st LA 62.
THAT’S THAT
We have just heard of a young man who was the recipient of a
good salary. He was a likeable chap who had a way of making
friends and of being a good fellow generally. He was given
use of a good car—for business purposes, with gasoline and oil
repairs thrown in. He was a good dresser and a good spender,
a big shot at a service club or two. He got tight once or twice,
took an occasional trip in the car for private purposes. He
given a hint or two to “fotch up.” He was penitent—for two or
three months only to break out again. In his last pay envelope
were these magic words “Services no longer required.” Getting
tight and pinching rides may be excruciatingly funny, but they are
hard on the pay envelope. By the way, this isn’t a sermon. It’s a
package of brass tacks packed in hardpan.
FORM III
CH AL CO LI LA FR PH AH OC
Atkinson, Barbara ....................... 70 16 78 54 51 55 ab
lA’niy ty ........ ....................f.................. 64 33 44 51 5'4 50 29
a d 1VT. ........ ........ab 63 74 ab ab 79 65
Ts u a w n TT* ...... ........ ...44 57 83 47 21
Brown, W.......................................... 31 53 49 55 718:30
59Dinney, B.......................................... 33 32 56 50 3'6 50
35 49nilint. M ................... .................... 42 52 52 51 60 55
Follick, P.......................................... 62 75 69 72 61 721 82 74
ITncifPi* TP ......... .........................................46 63 37 31 46 47 52 60
Fiikf S .......................................... 56 83 16'6 72 47 70 66 60 ■63
fPi’nvnp T?........ .......w •«80 54 56 71 87 66 54
Gaiser A ........... .................... 41 36
56 ab ah ab 52 50 59
1VT ....... ........................ 55 93 63 66 49 59 54 68
7-Tnrvft.v T)......... ........ .................. 68 84 69 56 71 22 ■68
Heywood, M. ........ ...................... 33 45 GO'41 60
M ........................................ 55 21 151 52 55 5L 43 68
Wpi'ii W ........................63 46 50 41 48 40 56
Jennings, J...................................... 26 15 51 39
84 80.
14
65
5'6
Tvdland "R ........ ........ .<
JpffAry C!....... ............. 43 76 42 38 30 50 50 63
T nh 11 ft. ........ ........ ..................... 51 90 73 ab 64 80 72 67
T.pwics Til ...................................... 78 85 75 84 80 80 76 73 77
Mnv W .........................................72 64 '67 37 601 52 47
.............. 65 64 58 73 55 71 64 74
............... 4'6 43 38 51 41 59
*Pawa11 M........ ........ ...38 56 5 6 70
Reid, O...................... ...................... 39 '89 ab 64 72 11 ab 79
Reid^ P. ........ ........... ..................... 72 70 52 66 39 ab 61 66
............... 11 54 69 62 36 65 56 70
Stanb’ury, E. ........ ................ .... ‘66 166 78 77
59
53 58 83
.FX1* i n 11 AT*.. 7-L ........ • i *..................55 55 5 6 67 57 57
Tnvlnr .1 ....... ......... ........... 66 82 69 74 70 67 64 55
Van Camp, I........*■.............
51
70 69 66 54
60Walper, H.......................................... 60 71 5'8 44 59 63
Prouty, P........................................... 41 •66 47 76 52 60 64 56
Brown, F 4th GE 0;Heywood, M.1st LA 68; Jennings, J. 2nd LA 26,
The Toronto Globe asks regarding the men sent down by the
electors of Ontario to conduct the business -of this Province “Is it a
parliament?”- There can be but one answer. The Toronto paper
then proceeds- to say:
“Ontario electors may well ask themselves whether their Pro
vincial Legislature is a parliamentary institution or an outlaw among
governing bodies. The language used in debate at various times
during, the present session has made it a burlesque show. The pas
sage between the Premier and former Premier recently was a
' deplorable disregard of the amenities of debate which ought to be
observed. Mr. Henry may have been overwrought by the strain of
the day and by the gibes of Mr. Hepburn. He withdrew the words
“You contemptible cur,” which should not have been uttered under
any provocation. Both leaders were wrong in theii* attitude toward
what is supposed to be an assembly of dignity and importance and
which has to be preserved as such if it is to hold the respect of the
people.”
We leave our readers to do their own thinking and to draw their
own conclusions. We ask, nevertheless, Ihow long this sort of thing
is to continue? We thought that conditions would mend when
women voted. Have they? We thought that folk in parliament
would get down to business were farmers in control. Have they?
Both Mr. Hepburn and Mr. Henry are farmers. Both these men were
elected to the place of leadership of their parties by the men and
women of those parties.
What is to be done about it? Nothing can be done while such
conduct goes unwhipped of public opinion.
The Globe concludes with the following words that we commend
to Mr. Speaker and others responsible for the conduct of the legis
lature. It’-s
rules:
“If the
the (Speaker
Parliament what is it?
a year to support an institution which has not sufficient respect for
itself to take its duties and its words seriously.”
^2hd FR 76; Ireland, B. 5th CO 60, 5th LI 60; May W. Sth CO 67; Powell
M. 2nd LA 15; PH 18, EG 66; Stanbury E., 2nd LA 63; Skinner, B. 2nd
FR 71; Van Camp, I., !5th CO 60; 5th |LI 65; 4tli GE 95.
FORM IV
CO LI IAIH CH AL GE PH CII LA LC
Brintnell, John ...........................
Brooks, Gordon ...........................
Dinney, Robert ........ .......
Ellerigton, Robert .......................
Goetz, Albert ...............................
Hicks, Mildred ........ .................
Hodgson, Reginald ........ ..........
Howey, Lome ...........................
Klumpp, Howard ..... ........ ...
Oestreiclier, Donald ....... .......
Passmore, Russell .....................
Penhale, William ........ ..............
Ratz, Reta ............... ........ ....
Restomoyer, Hubert ...................
Sandors, Borden ........ .. ....
Sanders, Warren ........ ..............
Snell, Charles ........ ........ .......
Stanbury, John ........ ........ .....
■Strang, Alex ........ ...........
79
. 50 35 46 30
52 42 74 59
20 57 66 43 53 65
’J 3 81 43 26 0
.. ab ab ab ab ab
66 54 95 38 71 69
63 42 27
66 62 57 69 39 42 45
57 66 100 80 74
62 ab 66 89 51 66 i77
. 57 32 22 37 35 52
44" 53 65:85 82 50 59 70
.. ab ab ab ab ab
. 86 771 92 88 80 83
51 62 47
38 ab 40
45555220 40 55: 57 5b 58 67 39 47 47
47
60S3
5777
76
67
66
54
72
74
87
70
57
57
67
54
FA EC
TOWNSEND—BROADFOOT
“Spring Hill Farm” the home of
Mrs. Alexander Broadfoot, and the
late Mr, Alexander Broadfoot, Bruce-
field, was the scene of a pretty wed
ding at 4.30 o’clock on Thursday
April 2, when her daughter, Dorothy
Shaw, was united in marriage to
Elmer Townsend, son of Mr. and
Mrs. Amos Townsend, Tuckorsmith,
The bride, given away in marriage
by her brother, was becomingly
gowned in white net over taffeta
and her veil of shoulder length was
worn by her grandmother, 75 years
ago. Her flowers were Briarcliffe
Roses. Miss Elizabeth Broadfoot, of
Hamilton, was her sister’s maid of
honor, dressed in periwinkle blue
net fashioned after the style of the
bride’s gown, with matching acces
sories, and carried pink carnations.
The groomsman was Ray Townsend,
brother of the groom. The cere
mony was performed by Rev. AV. A.
Bremner, of Brucefield and Mrs.
Gordon Richardson played the wed
ding music. The bride’s mother re
ceived the guests in a black figured
crepe with corsage of mauve sweet
peas. 'The groom’s mother was
gowned in dark brown crepe with a
corsage of lavender sweet peas. Fol
lowing the ceremony the bridal
party led the way to the dining room
prettily decorated in pink and white
where dinner was served by the
Misses Alice Thompson, Marjory Mc
Ewen and Barbara Simpson.
The happy couple left immediate
ly on a trip to Sault Ste. Marie. The
bride chose for travelling a smart
navy blue swagger suit with match
ing accessories, -On their return
they will reside on “West Locherty,”
Earm in Tuckersmith.
C. R. HOWARD IS HOST
AT LUNCHEON
Hon. Norman Armour is Guest
Honor
of
Hon. Norman Arm-our, United
States minister to Canada, was the
guest of honor Tuesday at luncheon
at the Chateau Laurier when the
guests included a number of Parlia
ment members for Western Ontario
and some of the members of the
banking and commerce committee
and Mr. C'ase R. Howard, chairman
of the banking commission of the
Canadian-American Trade Board
acted as host.
The invited guests included Sena
tor Arthur Meiglien, Hon. C. A. Dun
ning, Hon. J. C. Gardiner, Hon. J. C.
'Elliott, Hon Ernest Lapointe, hon.
W. D. Euler, W. H- Moore, chair
man of the banking and -commerce
committee, W. H. -Golding, M. P., W.
Ross Gray, M.P., AV. Ross Macdon
ald, M.P., Col. D. G. Ross, M.P.,
Hugh Plaxton, M|P|, R. J. Deach-
man M.P., Hector -Charlesworth, R.
H. Coats, senator James Murdock
and H. Carl Coldenberg of McGill
University, Montreal.
Only Goodrich gives S
Golden Ply Blow-out $
Protection-it’s FREE
I0 There’s no reason now why
any one should take unneces
sary chances on blow-out acci
dents. The greatest safety
feature ever Revised, Golden
Ply blow-outmsrotection, is free
in Goodric^Sil ver towns, the
only tire
life-savi^feature. Wh
chanq^ou may rei
time*Come ii
a stazpf tl
PlyfC
Pthe world with thisS
gpra
___ H ^e”
us about
roodrich Golden
:owns.
Goodrich
SAFETY 5 dilvertown ®
WITH LIFE-SAVER GOLDEN PLY J
Thos. C. Coates
Phones
Garage 200 House 209
Exeter,Ontario
FRIENDS HONOUR
SIR-. E. F. (TED) TAMAN
On the occasion of his departure
in the near future, Mr. E. F. Taman
of the Canadian Bank of -Commerce,
was honored by friends at an enjoy
able function held in the bank apart
ments Friday evening. Mr, J. G.
Mills, manager of the Bank, spoke
briefly but appropriately of the ac
tive part Mr. Taman had played in
the activeness of the town and pre
sented him with a travelling; kit.
—-Huron Expositor
Purity Flour means real economy. It goes
farther. Rich in nourishing |
makes bread that rises right 11
the pans'-'and the most deliciogp biscuits*
cakes, pies and flaky pastry ^er baked S J
/Sr'
listen, it
to out of
PURITY F|
Best for allyou
k THE BEST BUNDS OF
1 PREPARED HOUSE HUNT
now
Ontario Legislature is a Parliament, it is the- duty oL’
to see that parliamenary rules prevail. If it is not a
Surely the public is not putting, up millions
a dark day when parliament does not respect its own
81100- 79
Harold (M) AL 75;60; Jackson,
Van Camp, Mary ......................... 95 88 64 76 71 85 72
Wilson, William ........................... 44 29 45 73 53
Brintell, John 3rd AL 56, 2nd LC 54; Brooks, Gordon 3rd FC 83;
Ellerington, Robert 2nd PH 35; Hodgson, Reginald 3rd LI 53, 3rd FC 59;
Passmore, Russell 3rd LI 52; Penhale, William 2nd GE 68; Ratz, Reta
5th LI 60; Sanders Borden 5th LI 91;, 3rd FA 87, 3rd FC 75; Sanders
Warren 5th AL 41; Stanbury, John 3rd Li 61; Strang, Alex 5th LI 62;
Wilson, William- 3rd LO 59.
Sanders, Warren dropped Trig.; Snell, Charles 2nd EG 40.
FORM V
LA DC FA FC EC EL HI AL GE TR PH CH BO ZO
Armstrong, Geraldine
Raynham, Charles
Bell Florence ........
Coates, Betty ........
Dunsford, Florence
Ditnsford, William
Essery, Beatrice ....
Hess, Paul ........
Hess, Quimby ...
I-Iornor, Jean ....
McFalls, Ardys
Martin, Patricia
Jackson, Harold
May, Gordon ....
Popper, Nelson
Stanbury, Jean
Sinclair, Norman
Sweet, Irene ......
Strange, Grace ..
’ McFalls, Ardys (M) LC
64 29
59 67
43 60
77 57
79
85 85
90 88
36 76 55
39
70 76 SO 71 70 14 33 74
49 50 42 53 41
45 57 65-57 55 27
52 53 34 S5 49
801 61 65
80 89 88 91 66 82
43 52 75 80 S3 78 78 66
______, _____ ..... . . , , May, Gor
don (M) GE 85; Stanbury, Joan (A) HI 64; (M) AL 545; Strange, Grace
(M) LC 60, (M) FA 77, (M) FC 58, (M) CH 62,
Sfluo« J
■ SJthe
5? .f«w>us