Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 2015-07-23, Page 18PAGE 18. THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, JULY 23, 2015. Examples show trail’s potential says Procter Continued from page 6 here: http://www.huronhealth unit.ca/health-topics/physical- activity/active-transportation/. • July 11, 2014: Goderich to Guelph Rail Trail Inc. (G2G) became a registered charitable organization. • Sept. 10, 2014: Huron County Committee of the Whole passed a motion to establish a G2G Working Committee to “work through the identified issues, develop a stewardship model, develop a cost and phasing model, convene a public open house, and report back to Council, be approved; and further that consideration be given in the 2015 budget for a temporary staff position to resource the G2G Working Committee.” • Huron and Perth County Councils created the Huron Perth G2G Working Committee and tasked it to guide county council decision-making on trail related issues. The G2G Trail Advisory Committee has been invited to, and participated in, all meetings. This has included arranging for testimony from adjoining landowners, stewardship groups and municipal administrators on the active portions of the trail as well as Ontario Trails Association and Regional Tourism Organization (RTO) 4 to provide experienced, independent insight. • Feb. 2015: G2G has support in both Wellington and Waterloo counties. Both of these counties agreed to sign the lease with the province so that the trail could be maintained and taken care of. The Region of Waterloo pledged $40,000 to support G2G in its efforts to rebuild bridges so that the trail can continue uninterrupted. • July 1, 2015: the Province of Ontario, after considerable deliberation, signed the lease with G2G as an interim measure to open all the unleased gaps for development and use. This gives G2G permission and responsibility to maintain these portions of the trail for everyone to use and enjoy. Now that some of the facts are out of the way, I have a few thoughts. First, the elephant in the room with all of this is that the ownership of the land and its intended use was never up for discussion. The Province of Ontario made that decision way back in 1988. That decision has always been out of the hands of the county, the volunteers and G2G Inc. The Province of Ontario, which owns the land, has never wavered from the intent of keeping the land public for the purpose of a trail. Second, Huron County has been working with G2G for over two years. People have provided input. Reports have been written. Motions have been passed. Yet, I keep hearing that “issues have not been addressed by G2G”. The Huron Perth Working Committee painstakingly dealt with the issues landowners identified and have discussed solutions to each issue. G2G is committed to working positively with landowners to solve any issues that might arise, but as yet, not one individual landowner has approached G2G with an actual problem to solve. G2G volunteers recognize, however, there is fear of the unknown. Opponents of the trail have lists of concerns that they take to news reporters, county and lower tier councils: anyone but the people who actually want to solve the problem. This is unfortunate because problems can only be solved by working together for the good of all stakeholders. Third, it seems a bit strange to me that people who claim to be concerned about trespassing issues think it is OK to vandalize the trail and threaten volunteers. Our stewardship group had planned to walk the trail and see what work was required – but was warned off because of threats by one or two landowners who are neighbours to the trail. Perhaps the notion of property rights only applies to a few people, not to all of us. G2G seems to be in harmony with the Ontario Federation of Agriculture’s policy statement on Abandoned Railway Rights of Way: “The OFA encourages the short, intermediate and long-term retention of abandoned rights-of-way by the province as an integral part of a rural redevelopment and revitalization strategy.” G2G also supports OFA’s call to put more teeth in the Trespass Act during the current provincial legislative review of Bill 100. Fourth. I have read that landowners are concerned about their liability insurance rates going up, however, there has been no documentation provided to substantiate the claim that managed usage will incur increased costs for insurance to adjoining landowners over the current state of unmanaged use by trespassers. I am a farmer and the Maitland River runs through our farmland. It is a navigable waterway, the riverbed is property of the crown, and as such, everyone can use it. We have farmed here for over 60 years. Our insurance company has never once said… “hey – the river runs through your property, which gives multiple access points – cough up an additional premium for liability.” What my insurance agent did say when I asked him was, “I sell insur- ance. If you want to purchase more liability insurance because you feel more at risk, I am happy to sell it to you.” Maybe he would also be happy to sell it to people who live beside a managed and maintained trail. Fifth, and perhaps most important, we have countless examples of railways being converted to trailways. This happens around the world. Stewards of Alberta’s Iron Horse Trail told me that developing the trail actually “protects farmers’ fields, joins small communities with common interests and it is economically beneficial to these communities.” We can just look in our own backyard. The GART, which runs from Goderich to Auburn and has for 17 years, is part of G2G. It works. People love it and are respectful of the land they are travelling through. The Maitland Trail actually uses private land, with landowner permission, and has done so for 40 years. It is also a much loved trail – so much so that our annual Camino hike, only in its third year, now is sponsored by local businesses because they can see the value that it brings to our area. With all the great examples of trails that exist in every part of the world, should we accept that the small portion located east of the Maitland River in Huron County is the only place on earth where people can’t figure out how to make it work? As you can probably tell, I could go on. But let’s go back to my opening thought. Now that the province has signed the lease with G2G, the Huron Perth Working Group Committee meetings have become confrontational and disruptive. Discussions about resolving landowner issues have regressed to the point where it is clear that the landowners’ only interest is in stopping the trail completely. Who, as a volunteer, wants to continually face an angry mob that has no intention to move forward or find solutions? Huron County is planning to hire a professional facilitator and the Huron County Federation of Agriculture has at least one staff member, possibly two, working on this issue. After years of discussion and reports, some people publicly complain that things are moving too fast regarding a decision that was made over 25 years ago. Really, the only decision that was ever in our hands is whether we, as Huron County, choose to be the stewards of the trail, or whether we continue to let G2G carry the torch. How much time, energy, and emotion will be spent trying to decide that? As rural communities – we simply cannot afford this. It is time for everyone to take a breath, look around, and decide if we can have respectful discussions, sort out our differences, stop talking and get something done – or whether we will continue to depend on big daddy government to step in and settle our squabbles like unruly children. Kate Procter holds a Bachelor of Science in Agriculture (OAC ’93) and a Masters of Science in Planning (OAC ’12), both from the University of Guelph. She was part of a team that researched and wrote the Active Transportation Plan for Huron County, led by Dr. Wayne Caldwell. Kate currently farms in Huron County, works as a consultant, editor and author, and has worked as a freelance journalist for almost 20 years. She has covered agricultural topics for Ontario Farmer, Better Farming, Rural Voice, National Hog Farmer, and the Stratford Beacon Herald. Kate volunteers as a board member and treasurer with the Maitland Trail Association and as Chair of the Maitland Conservation Foundation. Her past volunteer involvement includes Wingham Minor Soccer, Scouts Canada, Ontario Swine Health Advisory Board and the Blyth Festival. As of 2015, she volunteers as a liaison between the Maitland Trail Association and G2G. Kate may be contacted at kjprocter@gmail.com. Continued from page 12 bigger ripple effect when you consider the impact on issues like biosecurity. It can be hard to know where to begin to think about protecting your property. Now there is a new online resource to guide Ontario farmers and rural landowners through some simple steps for stronger on-farm security. A practical guide to on-farm security was developed in partnership with the Ontario Federation of Agriculture (OFA) and Farm & Food Care Ontario. This project was funded in part through Growing Forward 2, a federal-provincial- territorial initiative. The Agricultural Adaptation Council assists in the delivery of Growing Forward 2 in Ontario. The new guide to on-farm security is now available on the issues section of the Ontario Federation of Agriculture (OFA) website at www.ofa.on.ca. There are three main parts to the guide: securing your assets, visitors on the farm and when to call police. There are lots of simple tips like posting “No Trespassing” signs on every entrance to your farm, keeping a visitor’s log of anyone who visits your farm property, developing a rapport with local law enforcement and keeping buildings, vehicles and other facilities locked. The OFA is encouraging all members to access the tips in this new resource to strengthen their on-farm security. To deter unwanted visitors even more, the OFA has been advocating on behalf of farmers and rural landowners to update the Trespass to Property Act. The OFA is asking the government to impose a minimum $500 fine for trespassing and broader police enforcement of trespassing to address farm safety and biosecurity concerns. The current act has damage awards, or compensation for vandalism and property damage, set at only $1,000, far too low for the types of damage farmers and rural landowners are already dealing with. The OFA would like to increase the ceiling on damage awards to $25,000 to match the ceiling for small claims court, $25,000. The bottom line is to always be alert and aware of what is happening around your farm. Take a read through the new on-farm security resource for practical tips to put in place that will protect your farm assets and your family. OFA, FFCO create farm security guide And... time! As part of Townsend Tire’s 20th anniversary, which was held in Londesborough on Saturday, children were invited to participate in a pit crew challenge, where they were given the opportunity to try to fasten a race tire to a car and see how their time compared to those of professional racing teams. Here, Braidon Abell-Rinn takes on the challenge under the watchful eye of Dan Hoggart. (Vicky Bremner photo) The Citizen #1 And We Still Try Harder! Recent circulation figures show The Citizen has the highest circulation in the northern part of Huron County, #3 in the entire county. The Citizen Proudly Community-Owned Since 1985