Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Lucknow Sentinel, 1971-03-31, Page 10• PAGE TEN THE :.LUCICNOW ;SENTINEL;,.4UCKNOW, ONTARIO. WEDNESDAY, MARCH '3 it/ 1971 cr). 'W U N J0! 4. Ce !is EA01,46 . a•. LETTER• TO' THE EDITOR are We Eetting Teaching Of World Histo [ucknow. Sentinel,` • Dear Donald NOT MUCH SIGN :•, OF' PROGRESS, In the early -part of .last,suirnmet , I-wxotan article under the -head=— Wing' "A,'Big Job;Ahead" Two .of ••••, the''thing•s mentioned in this art isle were• 1, • The spectacular increase, in the; annual 'spending endin of the'Ontar- io. Department of Education dur-," • • w.: ing the 1969's. 2 intnlent that the . Disa ' of , PP. teache•rs.`and `professors in; the •high schools.and universities of:' Ontario' are not doing a much better ioh of teaching°world his' 'tory... and w`ith'a letter:of explanation, �I sent 'three •copies. of this �artic1,e. th nt rio D . �.rt . ..nt of 'to e,0, a >.Department me Educat-ionv:I addressed thein to Mr J:11.. McCarthy, Deputy Minister of Education,Mr, A.P Carnahan, Superintendent.or Curriculum (History) and to• Mr.' . Alex PMcCuaig• the Assistant . -Su erifi enc ent rCurricu u.m: These letters were all acknowled•- ged within a few weeks time Mr.McCarthY wrote rhe=a god g. g eneral"letter.' Mr. McCua,i• 'ack- nowledged two, of them - the one -sentto- Mr-.-Car-nahannd--his--ow-n Which he had received 'a• day 'or' two later, the first letter.�h:re ceived from `Mr McCuaiig was a red tape; -sort ofletter. in which :he referred me to the' Director. ' ' Ontario' Institute 'for:.Studaes in • Education., in connection with h -pro -Mein an . . e • ,,Kapuskasing. History Department Superintendent and. a Mr'. Spald. ing of North Bayin connection. with the efficiency -question. The s'eoondletter. I received from Mr, , McCuaig was a short friendly. letter in which he aga n inention,7= ed" d` Mr S a in of rth 1 N� Bay. • P g�• .y __I _wiotet ? > esea rS .Direr4oiY arid he wrote right back• and told me he',would'look into the:'niatter and let `me know about it as soon , as: he could. A Little•later on he' wrote me•to the effect that there , ' was no research being done on the, problem T e—Department . has • spent -many .millions'of dollars•in the ,interest of the controversial bilingual probl.em'but it seeinns_to have spent little of` nothing onthe nlore.irrportant problem :of doing its share towards ntaking sure that: world history: is• being.effecrively: a r.g ig s .. o. s. a n universities of North' � America... i a. in iny letter to h1r: Spalding, Written Over. twd months ago, 'urged, him to'.try to. providenme= ' With 'a :yes'or no answer; to the question.,, '!Are the teachers and rofessors'in the high schools and un er''ities_o_LOntario doinu good job' of teaching world hist' • ory?" ., I have still. not received any 'a.cknowled. emPnt. 'of that letter: Actually, with no '• r esearch beim: done,on the prob �- : tem , it must be.'ratter difficult or Mr -. Spa ldi rg rxreap • with a:rep1y Also.'with'tlie of. tese;!ireh it: rriust be a bit...of guess work•.for;.tea.cher's •tnd•liro'l" essors to' kndw .whether- tliey ri ::,' using the.best methods of to ic•'hi1.; world history. ;`In my opinion t•l.r.e • biggest danger in connection iil •t e teac ing o' wor istory:iii. .North America. is the .failture'to • teach ;it :so that a..student i:zes that 'acquiring a, knowlcdL,' • of world history Js not only 'convenience but a.'necessit.> Examination results are. not.tlic. results Chat really count'. II teaching world history •i,o that: 'good basiLltnoided e ofth . ib •'ect is semen beredcb the .stud ent- long after b T aduation;=.,that is where' the importance of re • - ra i =_ search comes 1n. I have.,th i -. ression the attitude of tli•e' P Ontario Ike partrnent' of Educ atiori P to �Z rd -rhe-w rl� pea C prO t o o •O C,.in 9 i E Q, E N ocNccm tc �1A 'l1')• E. > r 0r VJ -a Q 1..1.J' o ° w cc' gc LL w • L.Lj O'W 00 aI < o ww -,d t