HomeMy WebLinkAboutHuron Expositor, 2014-07-16, Page 44 Huron Expositor • Wednesday, July 16, 2014
www.seaforthhuronexpositor.com
Huron Expositor
PUBLISHED WEEKLY — EST. 1860
P.O. Box 69, 8 Main Street
Seaforth Ontario NOK
phone: 519-527-0240
fax: 519-527-2858
www.seaforthhuronexpositor
SUN MEDIA
A Quebecor Media Company
NEIL CLIFFORD
Publisher
neil.clifford@sunmedia.ca
MAXWELL BICKFORD
Advertising Rep.
max.bickford@sunmedia.ca
DIANNE MCGRATH
Front Office
seaforth.classifieds@sunmedia.ca
WHITNEY SOUTH
Multimedia Journalist
seaforth.news@sunmedia.ca
SUBSCRIPTION RATES
1 YEAR $50.00 (47.62+2.38 GST)
2 YEAR $95.00 (90.48+4.52 GST)
SENIORS
60 WEEKS $50.00 (47.62+2.38 GST)
120 WEEKS $95.00 (90.48+4.52 GST)
Publications Mail Agreement
No. 40064683
RETURN UNDELIVERABLE CANADIAN ADDRESSES TO
CIRCULATION DEPARTMENT
RO. Box 69 Seaforth ON NOK
For any non -deliveries or delivery concerns:
phone: 519-527-0240
Advertising is accepted on condition that in the event of a typographical
error, the advertising space occupied by the erroneous item, together
with a reasonable allowance for signature, will not be charged, but the
balance of the advertisement will be paid for at the applicable rate. In
the event of a typographical error, advertising goods or services at a
wrong price, goods or services may not be sold. Advertising is merely
an offer to set and may be withdrawn at any time. The Huron Expositor
is not responsible for the loss or damage of unsolicited manuscripts,
photos or other materials used for reproduction purposes.
We acknowledge the financial support of the
Government of Canada through the Canadian Periodical
Fund (CPF) for our publishing activities.
Canada
editorial
Positive attitude,
positive change
Last week, McKillop
Ward Coun. Allison
Dekroon made a
presentation to council.
She spoke regarding a pro-
gram meant to help remove
barriers for those with
accessibility issues visiting
Seaforth's Main Street.
The plan, which includes
cooperation with stopgap.ca,
would see the implementation
of removable ramps given free
of charge to local businesses.
The hope is owners would set
out, and then remove, the
ramps based on customer
need.
Dekroon asked council to
endorse the plan, which
would require no financial
assistance from the munici-
pality. Volunteers would
build the ramps with funds
raised by a committee put
together by the Seaforth
Community Ramp Project
itself.
The motion was passed,
but not without a number of
questions and pushback from
some of the councillors.
Their worry was if someone
was to be injured on one of
these ramps, who would end
up footing the bill? For this
reason, many were tentative
about committing to support-
ing the project.
Though I understand their
concern, I was surprised at
the amount of negativity
expressed for a plan meant
to help create a safer envi-
ronment for those with
accessibility issues.
Grey Ward Coun. Dianne
Diehl stated she thought the
process of deploying and
removing the ramps seemed
like "a lot of hassle." Though
she also acknowledged the
"hassle" some have getting
into certain shops, I can
hardly agree with the overly
simplistic comparison.For
anyone who has a hard time
Column
Whitney South
Huron Expositor
getting around on a daily
basis, whether it's due to a
temporary injury or a per-
manent disability, even a
shopping trip downtown
can be a challenge. Per-
haps those questioning the
validity of the idea should
spend a day running
errands on Main Street
using a wheelchair or
walker. Maybe an experi-
ence climbing stairs on
crutches would send a
clear message.
After all, how can anyone
hope to make an informed
decision if they've never
walked a mile in someone
else's shoes?
No matter the idea, coun-
cil members seem to contin-
ually immerse themselves in
debate, focusing mainly on
the negative.
I get it; times are tough.
But when someone comes
forward with an idea meant
to bring positive change to
the municipality, why not
embrace it? It's always impor-
tant to be cautious, to make
sure you're looking at every
possible angle of each and
every situation. So why not
look at ways to face chal-
lenges instead of merely
deciding it's "too much has-
sle" to try?
In the end, council did a
great thing by agreeing to
endorse the project. Maybe
this can be their first step in
a more positive direction.
The world ain't all uni-
corns and rainbows, every
now and then we need make
our own sunlight.
Public sector workers
need a reality check
WI Agency
The public sector entitlement
culture has got to end.
It used to be that govern-
ment jobs didn't offer the
same pay and benefits as pri-
vate sector jobs, but at least
there was job security. That
was the trade-off.
Now, public servants generally
get better benefits than their pri-
vate sector counterparts.
Nothing proves this more than
the ridiculous conversation cur-
rently being had over paid sick
days for public sector workers.
Negotiations are underway
this week between the Public
Service Alliance of Canada
and the Treasury Board with
the latter hoping to "modern-
ize" the sick leave program by
replacing it with a new short-
term disability plan.
PSAC represents roughly
100,000 workers.
"We will not bargain conces-
sions," Chris Aylward, national
executive vice-president of PSAC,
said in a QMI Agency story. He
said scaling back the program
would be a "major concession."
So what, exactly, are we talking
about? Here's what public sector
workers receive under the cur-
rent program: 1.25 paid sick days
per month. That's 15 a year.
Let's be clear here: this is not
about vacation days. This is three
weeks of sick leave — on top of
vacation days — that all workers
are entitled to.
These days can be banked
throughout the term of
employment, although thank-
fully there is no cash payout at
the end.
So this is one of the perks
the union is willing to take to
the streets for? Taking away
this luxury is one of the mean
tactics those nasty old Con-
servatives are unleashing
upon society? Give us a break!
It's common sense to get rid of
this.
Many people in the private
sector don't get designated
sick days. In fact, a lot of peo-
ple in the private sector don't
even get paid vacation days.
Yet these are the folks who are
paying the wages of public
sector workers. The only major
concession here is that taxpay-
ers are forking out for this in
the first place.
To want to eliminate this pro-
gram isn't about judging the
quality of work or type of person
holding the position. It's a "no
hard feelings" proposition. It's
simply about creating a sustaina-
ble future.
Is it too much to ask public
servants to face the same realities
as the people they serve?
Have an opinion?
The Huron Expositor wel-
comes letters to the editor.
They must be signed and
accompanied by a phone
number for information
clarification.
It is important to note, letters
will not be able to be printed
without the author's name
attached.
All letters are subject to edit-
ing due to possible space
restriction.
Letters can be dropped off at
the office, mailed or emailed:
The Huron Expositor
8 Main St.
RO. Box 69, Seaforth, Ont.
NOK
seaforth.news@sunmedia.ca
SEAFORTH HURON EXPOSITOR — HOURS OF OPERATION
MONDAY: 9:00 - 5:00 • TUESDAY: - CLOSED • WEDNESDAY: - 9:00 - 5:00 • THURSDAY: - 9:00 - 5:00 • FRIDAY: - 9:00 - 5:00 • SATURDAY & SUNDAY: - CLOSED
ADVERTISING DEADLINE: FRIDAY AT 2:00 • PHONE 519-527-0240 • FAX: 519-527-2858
www.seaforthhuronexpositoncom