HomeMy WebLinkAboutClinton News Record, 2013-11-20, Page 44 News Record • Wednesday, November 20, 2013
News Record
VOL. 152 - ISSUE 46
PUBLISHED WEEKLY — EST. 1860
53 Albert St.
P.O. Box 39 Clinton ON NOM 1 LO
(519) 482-3443
www.clintonnewsrecord.com
SUN M
A Quebecor MediaEComDIApany
°
NEIL CLIFFORD
Publisher
nei I.cl ifford@sunmedia.ca
GERARD CRECES
Editorial
clinton. reporter@su nmedia.ca
MAX BICKFORD
Advertising Manager
max.bickford@sunmedia.ca
DAWN JOHNSTON
Sales Representative
clinton.ads@sunmedia.ca
CHRISTY MAIR
Front Office
clinton.classifieds@sunmedia.ca
Advertising is accepted on the condition that in the event of a
typographical error, the advertising space occupied by the erroneous
item together with a reasonable allowance for signature, will not
be charged but that balance of advertisement will be paid for at
the applicable rate. In the event of a typographic error advertising
goods or services at a wrong price, goods or services may not be
sold. Advertising is merely an offer to sell, and may be withdrawn
at any time.
The Clinton News -Record is not responsible for the loss or damage
of unsolicited manuscripts, photos or other materials used for
reproducing purposes.
Publications Mail Agreement
No. 40064683
RETURN UNDELIVERABLE CANADIAN ADDRESSES:
CIRCULATION DEPARTMENT
53 Albert St., Clinton ON NOM 1L0
(519) 482-3443
We acknowledge the financial support of the
Government of Canada through the Canadian
Periodical Fund (CPF) for our publishing activities.
Canada
0Cna
Member of the Canadian Community
Newspaper Association and the Ontario
Community Newspapers Association
editorial
Happiness is a reasonably
warm gun sentence
While the world is distracted by a crack
smoking municipal politician, some rather
unsettling things are happening at the federal
level.
Canadians are unfortunate enough to be
served another massive omnibus `budget' bill
this year, with the added bonus of having even
less discussion than normal due to another
prorogation. We've gotten used to this sort of
abuse of privilege from our federal majority,
though accountability still seems to be a con-
cept better preached than practiced.
However, some recent examples from the
news are showing how poorly designed ideol-
ogy is now being overturned in our province's
highest courts.
One -size fits all mandatory minimum sen-
tencing sounded great for those who bought
into the tough on crime agenda. However, in
two recent cases - one in Ontario, another in
Manitoba - the mandatory minimums for gun
crime were overturned as being too harsh, even
cruel, given the circumstances of the defend-
ants - both of whom were first-time offenders.
And if the provinces' highest court rules the
laws unconstitutional, we have to wonder how
they became laws in the first place.
Part of it could be pressure to keep an unreal-
istic promise to voters. Part of it could be that
scrutiny by committee has fallen by the way-
side, replaced by partisan obedience. Part of it
could even be that someone, somewhere along
the line actually believed this was a good idea
and that all people in contravention of the law
should be painted with the same brush.
Gun crime - crime in general - needs to be
addressed accordingly and punishments need
to act as a deterrent to those considering break-
ing the law and a lesson learned to those serv-
ing time. However, the desire to punish should
not replace careful consideration of all the facts.
Otherwise, there would be no distinction
between manslaughter, first-degree and sec-
ond-degree murder, or killing in self-defense.
The truly unsettling part of this all, however,
is not that a few mandatory gun sentences are
being ruled unconstitutional. The problem lies
in thousands of pages of bills that have been
crammed together and passed while Harper
has the numbers to do so.
Today it is gun crime, but how many other
ghosts in the political machine will surface in
the next few years as short-sighted, ideology -
driven, unconstitutional pieces of legislation?
-- Gerard Creces
www.clintonnewsrecord.com
Nobody's perfect, and
that's the way we like it
There are a couple reasons I never
wanted to write about Rob Ford. Firstly
- I dislike bandwagons and the jump-
ing on thereof. Secondly, I really strug-
gled with the separation of private and
public life that has
devolved since this drama
began.
Personally, I feel for the
guy. I've seen a lot of train
wrecks in my life, though
never one so public and
preventable. To put it in
the words of Brewer and
Shipley, this mess is just
"one toke over the line."
Had that crack tape never surfaced,
there is a good chance Toronto would
still be a functioning city with a func-
tional government. Since it has sur-
faced, Ford has been constantly in front
of the cameras, sometimes apologetic,
sometimes defiant and sometimes just
gross. I am not sure I would fare better
if I were under the same strain.
Everyone loves the guy, everyone
hates the guy, and everyone wonders
just what crazy antics he'll get up to
next. Because there is no tool to remove
him from office (and because he
refuses to leave office), the scrutiny
becomes even more vicious; all of it
building to the moment Ford finally
cracks, dies, or quits on his own.
Smoking crack is a personal choice.
Abusing alcohol is a personal choice.
Drinking and driving is a personal
choice.
They are all bad choices, true, but
they belong to the individual.
And depending on who the individ-
ual is, many of us are willing to overlook
the horrid in exchange for the horrible.
Ford's personal blunders coupled
with his political station have elevated
him to celebrity status and we as a soci-
ety are by and large very forgiving of
celebrities.
Think about it - if Rob Ford were a
Hollywood actor or a rap star, we would
just expect this type of behavior as nor-
mal. Crack smoking, drinking and driv-
ing, talking about cats they way he did
on national news - these foibles are all
part of what we love about
celebrities. We feel better not
being them, though we cer-
tainly enjoy their work. The
people of Toronto may not
think so at the moment, but
the rest of the world is
mesmerized.
Column
Gerard C
reces
I realize Ford's case is a bit
extreme, but does anyone out
there actually believe there
are any paragons to be found in poli-
tics? People cuss, they drink, they
smoke things they shouldn't, they have
marital troubles.
That we actually believe the veneer of
the hard working family man or woman
is more to our discredit than theirs.
That we become enraged when reality
surfaces shows how out of touch with
that same reality we've become.
So, what is the role of the politician in
this day and age? Is it to be a competent
manager of tax money? Is it to set fair
and just policy that benefits all constit-
uents regardless of who they voted for?
That much, any of them can and should
do.
But what is the role of the politician's
personal life in this day and age?
Do we still believe them to be role
models?
Politics is a dirty game. We should
not expect anything less from the
players.
Still, without his situation of privilege,
Ford would be treated as any other
criminal. Instead, his political power
wanes as his status as a celebrity grows
and it is the only the latter that could
see him through when all else fails.
It's mind boggling as a voter, but
makes perfect sense in a made -for -TV
way.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
The News Record welcomes letters to the editor. All letters must be signed and
include a daytime phone number for verification purposes. Letters can be sent care of
the Internet at clinton.news@sunmedia.ca, sent via fax at 519-482-7341 or through
Canada Post care of The Editor, P.O. Box 39, Clinton, ON NOL ILO.
CLINTON NEWS RECORD • HOURS OF OPERATION
MONDAY: 9:00 - 5:00 • TUESDAY: - CLOSED • WEDNESDAY: - 9:00 - 5:00 • THURSDAY: - 9:00 - 5:00 • FRIDAY: - 9:00 - 5:00 • SATURDAY & SUNDAY: - CLOSED
ADVERTISING DEADLINE: FRIDAY AT 2:00 • PHONE 519-482-3443 • FAX: 519-482-7341
www.clintonnewsrecord.com