HomeMy WebLinkAboutClinton News Record, 2013-12-11, Page 5C
C
LGItI MI
- J
3
0
Z
Zm
in I
Z
rn
E***
33213-1101
CONTINUED FROM > PAGE 4
the rewards were delicious.
So maybe I'm on to something.
I've always loved candy canes, particu-
larly the peppermint ones.
Growing up, my parents had to be care-
ful how many they decided to adorn the
Christmas tree with, because by the time
holidays rolled around, there were some
conspicuously bare patches toward the
wall.
Going way back, candy canes remind
me of visiting Santa at the old Zurich
arena. Each year my brother and sister
and I would pile into our snowsuits and
join hundreds of other kids to drink choc-
olate milk and watch old Woody Wood-
pecker cartoons on the projector before
getting to sit on Santa's lap (and getting a
treat bag). Maybe it is just a silly Christ-
mas memory, but I still get nostalgic about
chocolate milk and candy canes.
Which, to make this column circuitous,
is why I enjoy covering Christmas events.
Family, friends and total strangers all
get together to put smiles on each other's
faces.
And what tops it off for me, what really
makes it feel like Christmas, is a small
stick of peppermint candy, shaped like a
shepherd's crook
inline
cin oonnnewsrecord.com
Get all of your news, sports and more.
Serving Huron County
Breathe through
a straw
for 60 seconds.
Mars what
br waving is 1tkd
with cystic fibrosis,.
N a wonder so many
people with. CF
stop breathing
In their early 30s.
Please he Ip us.
LI)Canadian C'ystrc
E ik�fc�sis I'raurtrlaiivxt
maye
1-11O6-3'8{CFF • wsarw_cystirFarosia.ra
Wednesday, December 11, 2013 • News Record 5
www.clintonnewsrecord.com
letter to the editor
Liberal energy plan energetic in wrong way
To the Editor,
This week the Ontario government released its
Long Term Energy Plan. After reading the 87 pages
I'd like to offer some observations:
It's a fine example of political mathematics. They
are saving you money by increasing hydro costs less
than they said they were going to. It's still going up
rapidly but... The supposed "savings" actually come
by spending the $15 billion set aside for two new
reactors at Darlington and "saving" $200 million by
paying wind turbines not to produce. It's like a farmer
telling his wife, "no worries, I've paid this month's
mortgage by selling all the equipment and we're
going to save money in the future by burning $10
bills instead of $20s:'
Woo-hoo, the future is bright!
Conservation is the new "goal" for Ontario - noth-
ing wrong with that. Just it's the wrong time to do it. I
suggested efficiency technologies and conservation
was a much better strategy than the Green Energy
Act four years ago. Unfortunately instead of driving
conservation then to replace a small amount of coal
the government gushed money to create the most
aggressive build -out of wind and solar in the world.
Contracts were awarded despite already having con-
tracted electricity from 21 gas plants and four reactor
refurbishments. It was nuts; people said that and
were ignored. Now we have shrinking demand as
manufacturing shrinks and this over -capacity has to
be paid for whether we use it or not. If everybody
saves electricity now, we still have to pay the same
total contracted costs. The only way you can win at
that game is to conserve and hope all your neigh-
bours don't. It's sort of like an electrical version of
The Hunger Games.
Fossil fuels have a bright future in Ontario I'm
afraid. Surprisingly after creating one of the most
expensive and market retardant electricity systems in
North America our reliance on fossil fuels will con-
tinue as always. We will replace a small amount of
coal with greater reliance on natural gas. The long-
term plan shows gas use for electricity actually
increasing even though the plan is to quadruple
wind and solar from current levels. Unfortunately for
the environment, much of the conservation being
counted on will come from replacing clean but now
expensive electricity for heating loads to much higher
emissions but cheaper imported natural gas. It's
crazy to intentionally make the cleanest energy
choice the most expensive.
Public owned nuclear has been the workhorse for
Ontario's economy for decades but is now on a bub-
ble. Nuclear is our only "home grown" energy supply
and has worked very well. The public survey con-
ducted to supposedly guide the LTEP, chose contin-
ued use of nuclear as the first choice and gas plants
and wind/solar in as least preferred. The Ontario
Society of Professional Engineers has shown costs of
nuclear (with decommissioning) to be much lower
cost than a gas/wind/solar combination. What hap-
pened I wonder? The gas/wind alliance is very evi-
dent in Ontario.
The LTEP does commit to refurbishing reactors at
Darlington and the Bruce, but provides a host of off -
ramps or "escape clauses': All in it's a reduction in
nuclear's role by about 19 per cent. The government
says it has "saved" $15 billion for two new reactors,
but fails to mention it is committing us to $100 billion
for variable wind/solar over the next 25 years instead,
along with picking up the tab for the not so clean nat-
ural gas back-up.
Romania is now considering buying two new
CANDU's and what is our government doing? With
the Ontario content rules for wind/solar being
declared illegal recently, we will find ourselves pay-
ing offshore corporations to erect German turbines
and Chinese solar panels, while hoping the U.S.
doesn't run out of gas. Not a clever strategy. I'd never
suggest people shouldn't use wind or solar, it just
shouldn't be promoted at the expense of public inter-
est and the environment.
Please sign legal tactics petition
To the editor,
This is to ask your readers to sign the legal tactics
petition at Change.org.
This petition asks the Chief Justice of Canada to
instruct judges they must decide cases upon justice
rather than legal tactics, especially when they are
deciding upon the wellbeing of a child. The use of
legal tactics can be soul-destroying. As family
breakups are frequent and often end up in court, this
problem could easily have a future devastating
impact on somebody close to you.
This petition is about morally challenged lawyers
using tricks to get judges to ignore the law and make
Sincerely,
Robert Budd
decisions, which are unjust, unfair and often cruel.
Some examples are ignoring the principle that a per-
son should have the right to answer to allegations
against them, an unwritten law that men should not
have emotions and the use of an injunction based on
an appeal which all parties know will never happen.
For a detailed statement, go to Change.org and
search for "legal tactics': If you think justice is impor-
tant, please read and sign the petition and please for-
ward this message to as many people as you can.
Libraries, trucks and equipment, but no ice
To the editor,
Shame on Bluewater Council for putting an end to
the ice in the Bayfield Arena. If the ice -surface is
being so under -used, maybe you should hire a con-
sultant to figure it out since you people can't. The
municipality never seemed worried about expenses
before, with two new libraries and more and equip-
ment than a contracting firm.
Art Powell,
Enderby, B.C.
I hope for your sake the libraries, construction
equipment and trucks get over -used but I doubt it.
Seems that so-called wall down the centre of High-
way 21 has started to grow faster once again. (Blue -
water west vs. east)
Game on,
John Murray Taylor