HomeMy WebLinkAboutClinton News Record, 2014-07-23, Page 44 News Record • Wednesday, July 23, 2014
www.clintonnewsrecord.com
Clinton
News Record
PUBLISHED WEEKLY — EST. 1860
53 Albert St.
P.O. Box 39 Clinton ON NOM 1L0
(519) 482-3443
www.clintonnewsrecord.com
SUN MEDIA
A Quebecor Media Company
NEIL CLIFFORD
Publisher
neil.clifford@sunmedia.ca
MAX BICKFORD
Advertising Manager
max.bickford@sunmedia.ca
TARA OSTNER
Reporter
clinton.reporter@sunmedia.ca
DAWN JOHNSTON
Sales Representative
clinton.ads@sunmedia.ca
CHRISTY MAIR
Front Office
clinton.classifieds@sunmedia.ca
SUBSCRIPTION RATES
1 YEAR $50.00 (47.62+2.38 GST)
2 YEAR $95.00 (90.48+4.52 GST)
SENIORS
60 WEEKS $50.00 (47.62+2.38 GST)
120 WEEKS $95.00 (90.48+4.52 GST)
Advertising is accepted on the condition that in the event of a
Typographical error, the advertising space occupied by the erroneous
Rem together with a reasonable allowance for signature, will not be
charged but that balance of advertisement will be paid for at the
applicable rate. In the event of a typographic error advertising goods
or services at a wrong price, goods or services may not be sold. Ad-
vertising is merely an offer to sell, and may be withdrawn at any time.
The Clinton News -Record is not responsible for the loss or damage
of unsolicited manuscripts, photos or other materials used for
reproducing purposes.
Publications Mail Agreement
No.40064683
RETURN UNDELIVERABLE CANADIAN ADDRESSES:
CIRCULATION DEPARTMENT
53 Albert St., Clinton ON NOM 1L0
(519)482-3443
We acknowledge the financial support of the
Government of Canada through the Canadian
Periodical Fund (CPF) for our publishing activities.
Canada
Alocna
Member of the Canadian Community
Newspaper Association and the Ontario
Community Newspapers Association
editorial
Making sure the final
years are golden
QMI Agency
Most of us want to live longer, but not
enough of us are thinking about what kind
of life we would be living if we reached our
80's or our 90's.
Science and medical advancements, plus
better nutrition and other factors, are
allowing Canadians to live much longer
than their grandparents. But most of us
haven't quite nailed down the question of
quality of life. It's one thing to live to the age
of 90; it's quite another to live that life with-
out the aches and pains and other ailments
that usually dog the elderly.
And, in recent years, another wrinkle has
been added. Science and medicine may per-
mit Canadians to age gracefully, but will these
same Canadians have the financial means to
live a life of comfortable dignity?
To be sure, we are enjoying a greater life
expectancy. A report from Statistics Canada
on Thursday says the average Canadian, born
today, can expect to live 81.7 years. That's
substantially older than the 57 years a person
born in 1921 was expected to enjoy.
The reasons are varied, but the biggest factor
appears to be the introduction many decades
ago of penicillin and insulin, along with the pro-
motion of childhood immunizations. More
Canadians today survive their childhood. Gen-
erations ago, it wasn't unusual for parents to
have lost at least one child to illness.
Other factors for longevity include a reduc-
tion in the number of Canadians who smoke
tobacco. Canadians also have better attitudes
about healthy eating and exercise.
Automobiles are safer. In fact, they have never
been as safe... for both the driver and passen-
gers, and - some would argue - for pedestrians.
Workplace deaths have become fewer.
There are still dangerous occupations, such
as logging and agriculture, but the number of
people engaged in those activities represents
a much smaller percentage of the population.
The threat of disease has also been narrowed.
The challenge remains, however, for reaching
an older age of quality and that benchmark has
yet to be established. Science has helped. But a
necessary ingredient is financial security -- and
this might become the most difficult to provide.
Governments are struggling with the ques-
tion of pensions. Premier Kathleen Wynne has
even suggested that an Ontario Pension Plan is
needed. Our federal government says we
shouldn't be worried, at least with the Canada
Pension Plan. Yet there are scores of pensions,
many of them private, that are underfunded,
and this continues to be a worry in making sure
those golden years are truly golden.
column
The ups and downs of democracy
Tara Ostner
The Clinton News Record
Tomorrow night there is a candidate
information session being held in Clinton.
The night is geared towards those who are
interested in becoming candidates in the
upcoming 2014 municipal election and
anyone who is interested in local govern-
ment in general. These kinds of political
information sessions are a prime example
of democracy in action and are an essen-
tial part of what it means to be democratic.
The upcoming information session
reminds me of the time when someone
asked me whether I wanted to run as a can-
didate for a local political parry in my home-
town. After giving the idea some thought, I
declined mainly for two main reasons, rea-
sonswhich I still stand by today.
A part of me is certainly interested in
local government. After all, government is
an institution that creates and enforces
rules and laws for a society to follow. While
any institution can create rules and laws,
what makes government truly unique is
that it doesn't simply create rules but,
rather, it has both the power and authority
to enforce these rules and can do so by
compulsion or coercion. In this sense,
therefore, I am completely interested in
local government: I am, very naturally,
interested in what government can com-
pel and coerce me to do.
Some people might also say that becom-
ing involved in local government is every
person's right and people should exercise
this right because it gives them a voice to
be heard. However, it is because I don't
fully agree with these types of statements,
and because of my reservations about
democracy in general, that, when asked
about running as a candidate, I declined.
Of course, compared to the alternatives,
democracy or, rule by the many, far out-
weighs the alternatives. Tyrannies or, rule
by the one, namely, dictators, have obvi-
ous and disastrous effects. And aristocra-
cies and oligarchies or, rule by the few,
namely, the upper class and rich, can be
equally terrible. Having said this, there are
serious inconsistencies and contradictions
within democratic theory that, ultimately,
I have a difficult time accepting.
Sure, someone's voice may be heard in a
democracy but that's all that it may be:
heard. At the end of the day, though, it may
not be actually listened to and this is
because democracy is ultimately driven by
the majority, nothing else; indeed, major-
ity rules is what defines this type of govern-
ment. But what about the minority? If, in
an election, the majority wins 51% of the
vote, does this mean that the other 49% are
simply out of luck? Does this essentially
tell practically half of the population, sorry,
your interests don't weigh as much as
these other people's? The short answer is
yes, and I think that this is one of the most
serious problems that democracy faces.
Because the majority will, by definition,
always win in a democracy, the minority
will, therefore, always lose.
Furthermore, there are some minority
groups in the world that continue to always
lose. Take, for example, indigenous people
within certain societies. Democratic societies
will attempt to treat these sorts of minority
groups well, for instance, according to their
own conception of the good. However, the
problem surfaces of course when the demo-
cratic society's conception of the good is not
the same as the minority group's conception
of the good. Because democratic societies
are so widely accepted as the norm today,
people can assume that these societies know
what is good for everyone. However, this is a
mistaken assumption that can lead to very
bad outcomes for minority groups, as well as
individuals.
Even if a majority wins 99% of the vote, the
fact that 1% of the population's interests will
be ignored still raises an issue forme. Might
does not make right and we simply have to
look back on history to see the truth of this.
Nevertheless, democracy prevails in most
civilized countries and it does so for good
reason, namely, because there is no better
alternative. Democracy allows individuals to
come together, exchange ideas and have
public information sessions such as the one
tomorrow night in Clinton. And this, I think,
is perhaps democracy's best quality, namely,
it provides people with aforum by which
they can discuss and debate. Even though
not everyone's voice will be listened to, eve-
ryone's voice at least has the potential to be
heard and, in afar from perfect world this, I
think, is the best that we can hope for at this
point in time. Also, this is not to say that indi-
viduals cannot continually strive to have
their voice listened to. After all, sometimes
the quest for something matters more than
the results anyway.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
The News Record welcomes letters to the editor. All letters must be signed and include a
daytime phone number for verification purposes. Letters can be sent care of the Internet at
clinton.news@sunmedia.ca, sent via fax at 519-482-7341 or through Canada Post care of
The Editor, P.O. Box 39, Clinton, ON NOL 1LO.